| Literature DB >> 19549748 |
Helga A Sigurjonsdottir1, Ruth Andrew, Roland H Stimson, Gudmundur Johannsson, Brian R Walker.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evidence from long-term clinical studies measuring urinary steroid ratios, and from in vitro studies, suggests that GH administered for longer than 2 months down-regulates 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11beta-HSD1), thereby reducing cortisol regeneration in liver and adipose tissue. We aimed to measure acute effects of GH on 11beta-HSD1 in liver and adipose tissue in vivo, including using a stable isotope tracer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19549748 PMCID: PMC2754375 DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Endocrinol ISSN: 0804-4643 Impact factor: 6.664
Effects of GH withdrawal and re-introduction.
| Baseline | 3 week withdrawal | 3 week reintroduction | Baseline | 3 week withdrawal | 6 week withdrawal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| Age (years) | 64.0±2.1 | 64.5±4.8 | ||||
| Height (cm) | 177.4±3.2 | 178.6±2.4 | ||||
| GH dose (mg/d) | 0.4±0.2 | 0 | 0.4±0.2 | 0.3±0.2 | 0 | 0 |
| IGF1 (ng/ml) | 153.2±16.0 | 57.5±8.7§ | 152.4±19.7¶ | 180.5±28.6 | 78.2±15.7‡ | 72.8±12.2§ |
| Weight (kg) | 89.0±2.9 | 88.6±3.20 | 88.5±3.7 | 102.8±9.2 | 102.4±9.2 | 102.5±8.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.5±1.6 | 28.5±1.6 | 27.2±1.5 | 32.2±2.6 | 32.3±2.6 | 32.0±2.6 |
| Waist (cm) | 100.6±5.2 | 102.3±4.7 | 98.0±2.8 | 108.2±6.1 | 107.7±5.5 | 105.2±6.2 |
| Hip (cm) | 103.8±1.5 | 104.4±1.8 | 102.8±0.6 | 110.2±4.1 | 109.8±3.9 | 108.4±4.3 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.97±0.04 | 0.98±0.03 | 0.95±0.03 | 0.98±0.02 | 0.98±0.02 | 0.97±0.02 |
| DEXA % fat | 25.9±3.6 | 26.1±4.1 | 21.9±2.1 | 28.9±2.7 | 30.0±3.2 | 30.3±2.6∥ |
| DEXA lean mass (kg) | 61.8±2.9 | 61.5±3.2 | 65.2±3.2 | 68.3±4.3 | 66.0±3.1 | 66.5±3.8 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 140±6 | 145±7 | 137±6 | 145±10 | 142±8 | 138±10 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 81±2 | 83±2 | 80±3 | 85±5 | 83±5 | 81±5‡ |
| Fasting plasma | ||||||
| Glucose (mM) | 4.75±0.25 | 4.60±0.23‡ | 4.42±0.24 | 5.02±0.30 | 4.88±0.53 | 4.45±0.21‡ |
| Insulin (mU/l) | 6.38±2.55 | 3.52±0.48 | 3.66±0.49 | 11.52±4.01 | 15.92±11.29 | 8.20±2.58 |
| FFA (mM) | 0.51±0.08 | 0.40±0.09 | 0.37±0.06 | 0.59±0.05 | 0.40±0.03‡ | 0.35±0.03§ |
| Triglycerides (mM) | 0.84±0.07 | 0.76±0.05 | 0.99±0.10 | 2.27±0.52* | 1.90±0.52 | 1.77±0.49§ |
| 24 h urine | ||||||
| Total cortisol metabolites (mg/d) | 9.84±3.17 | 11.10±2.9 | 14.2±2.3 | 10.3±1.9 | 9.5±0.8 | 9.5±1.8 |
| (5αTHF+5βTHF)/THE | 2.33±0.79 | 8.07±2.56 | 8.08±3.42 | 5.55±2.59 | 6.34±2.63 | 5.20±3.13 |
| Cortisol/cortisone | 9.74±4.65 | 5.67±1.42 | 4.98±1.02 | 8.93±5.77 | 5.24±2.20 | 8.22±3.36 |
| 5αTHF/5βTHF | 1.06±0.11 | 1.02±0.12 | 1.15±0.09 | 1.62±0.29 | 1.47±0.18 | 1.20±0.33 |
| 5αTHF/cortisol | 8.03±1.39 | 9.41±1.72 | 9.57±0.69 | 11.73±1.67 | 11.48±2.19 | 8.87±2.31‡ |
| 5βTHF/cortisol | 7.82±1.39 | 9.09±1.16 | 8.24±0.74 | 7.73±1.13 | 8.56±1.94 | 8.35±1.43 |
| d4-Cortisol tracer kinetics | ||||||
| d4-Cortisol clearance (l/min) | 0.73±0.29 | 1.93±1.37 | 0.79±0.22 | 0.65±0.14 | 0.66±0.16 | 0.86±0.21‡ |
| Ra d3-cortisol (nmol/min) | 15.3±1.0 | 16.1±2.5 | 13.4±0.9 | 6.5±0.9† | 7.4±1.4 | 6.8±1.1 |
| Plasma cortisol after oral cortisone | ||||||
| Appearance rate constant ( | 0.074±0.019 | 0.031±0.008 | 0.046±0.014 | 0.061±0.031 | 0.041±0.012 | 0.073±0.024 |
| Adipose mRNA | ||||||
| 11β-HSD1 | 0.55±0.09 | 0.65±0.17 | 0.65±0.20 | 0.69±0.14 | 0.64±0.14 | 0.79±0.25 |
| Hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase | 0.75±0.07 | 0.73±0.08 | 0.59±0.03 | 0.71±0.09 | 0.78±0.07 | 0.69±0.09 |
| GRα | 0.80±0.08 | 0.77±0.09 | 0.74±0.05 | 0.83±0.09 | 0.73±0.07 | 0.86±0.09 |
| 5α-Reductase 1 | 0.94±0.10 | 1.12±0.15 | 1.23±0.34 | 1.00±0.07 | 0.92±0.13 | 1.18±0.17 |
*P<0.05, †P<0.01 for differences between study groups at baseline; ‡P<0.05, §P<0.01, ∥P<0.001 for effects of GH withdrawal (i.e. differences from baseline) within each study group; ¶P<0.01 for effects of GH reintroduction (i.e. differences from 3 week withdrawal) in study group 1. BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; FFA, free fatty acids; Ra, rate of appearance; GR, glucocorticoid receptor.
Note that one subject withdrew from the GH reintroduction group, so that mean data may appear to differ from values after 3 weeks withdrawal, but only statistically significant differences are highlighted.
Total cortisol excretion was calculated from the sum of 5β-THF, 5α-THF and THE. The balance between 11β-HSD activities in all tissues was assessed as the ratio of (5β-THF +5α-THF)/THE. Renal 11β-HSD type 2 activity was assessed as urinary cortisol/cortisone ratio. The balance of 5α- and 5β-reductases was assessed by the ratio 5β-THF/5α-THF. 5α- and 5β-reduction of cortisol was also assessed by 5α-THF/cortisol and 5β-THF/cortisol ratios.
Figure 1Effects of GH withdrawal and re-introduction on 11β-HSD1 conversion of cortisone to cortisol. (A) Rate of appearance (Ra) of d3-cortisol during steady-state d4-cortisol infusion. Results are shown for individual patients allocated to 6 weeks GH withdrawal (squares) or GH withdrawal and reintroduction (circles). Summary statistics are shown in Table 1. Results varied widely among patients with hypopituitarism but by chance, Ra of d3-cortisol was higher in the group allocated with GH reintroduction. However, there were no significant changes in Ra of d3-cortisol on GH withdrawal for 3 or 6 weeks, or on GH reintroduction for 3 weeks. (B) First pass conversion of cortisone to cortisol in liver. Results show mean±s.e.m. plasma cortisol concentrations after oral administration of cortisone acetate 25 mg at time=0. Results were compared by repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc paired Student's t-tests, if appropriate. In all participants (n=12), there was a difference between baseline (open circle, solid line) and 3 weeks of GH withdrawal (open squares, solid lines; P<0.03; post hoc tests significant at time =150 and 180). There was no additional significant change in plasma cortisol after 6 weeks GH withdrawal (n=6; filled squares, dotted lines). However, cortisol values were reduced by reintroduction of GH treatment (n=6; filled circles, dotted lines; P<0.02 by ANOVA, no single time-points significant in post hoc tests). Curves from each individual were fitted with Kinetica software: the appearance rate constants (Ka) are shown in Table 1 and did not differ between groups.