Literature DB >> 15004437

Modulation of cortisol metabolism during treatment of acromegaly is independent of body composition and insulin sensitivity.

Giovanni V Frajese1, Norman F Taylor, Paul J Jenkins, G Michael Besser, John P Monson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The set point of cortisol-cortisone conversion is shifted in the direction of cortisone by the inhibition of the activity of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11beta-HSD1) during adult GH replacement and in active acromegaly. Additionally, both fat mass and insulin may modulate 11beta-HSD1 and are both influenced by changes in GH status. This study examined the relative direct contribution of GH/IGF1 in modulating cortisol metabolism.
METHODS: Overall cortisol/cortisone conversion (ratio of urine 11-hydroxy-/11-oxo-cortisol metabolites; Fm/Em), insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment; HOMA %S) and fat mass (DXA) were examined in parallel in 6 patients (mean age 53 years, range 42-76; 4 males, 2 females) with previously untreated active acromegaly during 6 months of therapy with Sandostatin LAR (20-30 mg i.m. 4 weekly). All but 1 patient had normal ACTH reserve.
RESULTS: At baseline, Pearson correlation demonstrated an inverse relationship between serum GH (mean of a 5-point day curve) and Fm/Em (r = -0.83, p = 0.04) and a trend towards an inverse relationship between HOMA %S and Fm/Em (r = -0.79, p = 0.06) but no other patterns were evident. During the course of treatment, serum GH decreased from 9.9 +/- 6.4 (mean +/- SD) to 3.5 +/- 3.1 ng/ml (p < 0.01) and serum IGF-1 from 785 +/- 268 to 431 +/- 156 ng/ml (p < 0.005). Fm/Em increased from 0.52 +/- 0.1 to 0.75 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.03) consistent with increased 11beta-HSD1 activity. There were no significant changes in truncal fat percentage (33.0 +/- 9.0 vs. 33.0 +/- 8.2) or insulin sensitivity (HOMA %S: 37.1 +/- 8.6 vs. 52.8 +/- 33.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of cortisol metabolism during treatment of active acromegaly is dependent on changes in GH/IGF-1 status and is not influenced by any individual change in body composition or insulin sensitivity. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15004437     DOI: 10.1159/000077135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Res        ISSN: 0301-0163


  5 in total

1.  Changes in metabolic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors after therapeutic control of acromegaly vary with the treatment modality. Data from the Bicêtre cohort, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Claire Briet; Mirela Diana Ilie; Emmanuelle Kuhn; Luigi Maione; Sylvie Brailly-Tabard; Sylvie Salenave; Bertrand Cariou; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  HOMA-IR in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Betina Biagetti; Anna Aulinas; Anna Casteras; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Rafael Simó
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Gene Expression Signature in Adipose Tissue of Acromegaly Patients.

Authors:  Irit Hochberg; Quynh T Tran; Ariel L Barkan; Alan R Saltiel; William F Chandler; Dave Bridges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The acromegaly lipodystrophy.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Lack of regulation of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 during short-term manipulation of GH in patients with hypopituitarism.

Authors:  Helga A Sigurjonsdottir; Ruth Andrew; Roland H Stimson; Gudmundur Johannsson; Brian R Walker
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 6.664

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.