Literature DB >> 19549083

The paradox of received social support: the importance of responsiveness.

Natalya C Maisel1, Shelly L Gable.   

Abstract

Although the perception of available support is associated with positive outcomes, the receipt of actual support from close others is often associated with negative outcomes. In fact, support that is "invisible" (not perceived by the support recipient) is associated with better outcomes than "visible" support. To investigate this paradox, we proposed that received support (both visible and invisible) would be beneficial when it was responsive to the recipient's needs. Sixty-seven cohabiting couples participated in a daily-experience study in which they reported on the support they provided and received each day. Results indicated that both visible and invisible support were beneficial (i.e., associated with less sadness and anxiety and with greater relationship quality) only when the support was responsive. These findings suggest that the nature of support is an important determinant of when received support will be beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19549083     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  53 in total

1.  A Double-Edged Sword: Race, Daily Family Support Exchanges, and Daily Well-Being.

Authors:  Kelly E Cichy; Robert S Stawski; David M Almeida
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2014-11

2.  Measuring a New Stress Domain: Validation of the Couple-Level Minority Stress Scale.

Authors:  Torsten B Neilands; Allen J LeBlanc; David M Frost; Kayla Bowen; Patrick S Sullivan; Colleen C Hoff; Jason Chang
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-09-24

3.  Does support need to be seen? Daily invisible support promotes next day relationship well-being.

Authors:  Yuthika U Girme; Michael R Maniaci; Harry T Reis; James K McNulty; Cheryl L Carmichael; Shelly L Gable; Levi R Baker; Nickola C Overall
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2018-09-13

4.  The relationship between perceived promotion of autonomy/dependence and pain-related disability in older adults with chronic pain: the mediating role of self-reported physical functioning.

Authors:  Marta Matos; Sónia F Bernardes; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-02-27

5.  A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships.

Authors:  Brooke C Feeney; Nancy L Collins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-08-14

6.  The effects of interpersonal emotional expression, partner responsiveness, and emotional approach coping on stress responses.

Authors:  Heidi S Kane; Joshua F Wiley; Christine Dunkel Schetter; Theodore F Robles
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-09-27

7.  Social support needs: discordance between home hospice nurses and former family caregivers.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Kristin G Cloyes; Joan Carpenter; Patricia H Berry; Margaret F Clayton; Lee Ellington
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-02-17

8.  When low self-esteem encourages behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence: the role of relational self-construal [corrected].

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-04-15

9.  A dyadic analysis of relationships and health: does couple-level context condition partner effects?

Authors:  Ashley B Barr; Ronald L Simons
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-08

10.  Relationships between types of father breastfeeding support and breastfeeding outcomes.

Authors:  Lynn A Rempel; John K Rempel; Katrina C J Moore
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.