Literature DB >> 30265076

The effects of interpersonal emotional expression, partner responsiveness, and emotional approach coping on stress responses.

Heidi S Kane1, Joshua F Wiley2, Christine Dunkel Schetter3, Theodore F Robles3.   

Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in Emotion on Sep 5 2019 (see record 2019-52812-001). In the article, two text call outs for figures are incorrect. At the end of the "Negative emotional responses" section under the "Psychological Stress Responses" heading, "(see Figure 7)" should have been deleted. Under the "Negative task-related ruminative thoughts" heading in that same section, "(see Figure 5)" in the first paragraph should be "(see Figure 7)."] Expressing emotions is a common strategy for coping with stress. Yet, little is known about the effects of using this strategy in close relationships, or when and for whom emotional expression is effective. This study examined romantic partner responsiveness and the dispositional tendency to use emotional approach coping (EAC; the processing and expression of emotions) as moderators of the effects of experimentally manipulated emotional expression on stress responses to a laboratory stressor. We brought couples (N = 145) to the lab and randomly assigned 1 partner (the participant) to perform a stressful task. We manipulated whether participants expressed their feelings about the task to their partner (expression vs. no-expression), and whether participants received supportive messages from their partners (as an indicator of partner responsiveness; support vs. no-support). We examined physiological stress responses (cortisol and salivary alpha-amylase [sAA]), negative emotional stress responses (anxiety and self-conscious emotions), and post-task ruminative thoughts. Participants high in EAC showed larger sAA and cortisol responses and reported more negative post-task ruminative thoughts after emotionally expressing to their partners, but partner support mitigated the effect on cortisol. Participants low in EAC showed smaller cortisol responses and reported less negative emotional responses and fewer negative post-task ruminative thoughts after emotionally expressing to their partners. Receiving partner support reduced negative emotional responses for people high in EAC, but increased negative emotional responses for those low in EAC. These results may help explain when and for whom emotional expression is an effective means of coping in the immediate context of a stressor. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30265076      PMCID: PMC6640093          DOI: 10.1037/emo0000487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  49 in total

1.  Emotional approach coping and self-efficacy moderate the effects of written emotional disclosure and relaxation training for people with migraine headaches.

Authors:  Christina A Kraft; Mark A Lumley; Pamela J D'Souza; John A Dooley
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-02

2.  Gender role conflict and emotional approach coping in men with cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Hoyt
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-10

3.  Relations between anger expression and cardiovascular reactivity: reconciling inconsistent findings through a matching hypothesis.

Authors:  T O Engebretson; K A Matthews; M F Scheier
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1989-09

4.  Correlates and consequences of the disclosure of pain-related distress to one's spouse.

Authors:  Annmarie Cano; Laura E M Leong; Amy M Williams; Dana K K May; Jillian R Lutz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  How benefits of expressive writing vary as a function of writing instructions, ethnicity and ambivalence over emotional expression.

Authors:  Qian Lu; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-07

6.  Momentary work worries, marital disclosure, and salivary cortisol among parents of young children.

Authors:  Richard B Slatcher; Theodore F Robles; Rena L Repetti; Michelle D Fellows
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.312

7.  Emotionally expressive coping predicts psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer.

Authors:  A L Stanton; S Danoff-Burg; C L Cameron; M Bishop; C A Collins; S B Kirk; L A Sworowski; R Twillman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-10

8.  Expressing thoughts and feelings following a collective trauma: immediate responses to 9/11 predict negative outcomes in a national sample.

Authors:  Mark D Seery; Roxane Cohen Silver; E Alison Holman; Whitney A Ence; Thai Q Chu
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-08

9.  For whom does it work? Moderators of the effects of written emotional disclosure in a randomized trial among women with chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Sally A Norman; Mark A Lumley; John A Dooley; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

10.  Neuroendocrine and psychometric evaluation of a placebo version of the 'Trier Social Stress Test'.

Authors:  S Het; N Rohleder; D Schoofs; C Kirschbaum; O T Wolf
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.905

View more
  3 in total

1.  Emotional Processing Coping Methods and Biomarkers of Stress in Young Adult Testicular Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Katie Darabos; Michael A Hoyt
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of emotion regulation on cortisol.

Authors:  Mai B Mikkelsen; Gitte Tramm; Robert Zachariae; Claus H Gravholt; Mia S O'Toole
Journal:  Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-12-11

3.  The effects of a music intervention during port catheter placement on anxiety and stress.

Authors:  Nora K Schaal; Johanna Brückner; Oliver T Wolf; Eugen Ruckhäberle; Tanja Fehm; Philip Hepp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.