Literature DB >> 19548931

A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.

S L Farrier1, N A Drage, R G Newcombe, S J Hayes, P M H Dummer.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the quality of periapical radiographic images produced by two digital dental radiography systems, a charge-coupled device (CCD) and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) image plate system, and to examine the overall radiation exposure when using these systems in a clinical setting.
METHODOLOGY: Patients were randomly allocated to both systems and the resultant radiographs rated for quality. The expected radiation exposure for an investigation was calculated.
RESULTS: Overall, 98 images were acquired using the CCD system and 108 with the PSP system. The PSP system produced significantly higher quality (P < 0.001) periapical images compared with the CCD system. The CCD system required significantly more (P < 0.001) repeat exposures to obtain a diagnostic image than the PSP system but at a lower expected radiation exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: The image quality was superior using the phosphor plate system. Although more repeat radiographs were required using the CCD system, the images were produced with a lower expected radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19548931     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01593.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  5 in total

1.  Subjective image quality comparison between two digital dental radiographic systems and conventional dental film.

Authors:  Muhammed Ajmal; Mohamed I Elshinawy
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2014-08-19

2.  The quality of radiographs accompanying endodontic referrals to a health authority clinic.

Authors:  B S Chong; J Miller; S Sidhu
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Radiological and histopathological evaluation of experimentally-induced periapical lesion in rats.

Authors:  Renata Cordeiro Teixeira; Cassia Maria Fischer Rubira; Gerson Francisco Assis; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Tania Mary Cestari; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Clinical comparison of intraoral CMOS and PSP detectors in terms of time efficiency, patient comfort, and subjective image quality.

Authors:  Kıvanç Kamburoğlu; Erçin Samunahmetoğlu; Nejlan Eratam; Gül Sönmez; Sevilay Karahan
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Conventional versus digital radiography in detecting root canal type in maxillary premolars: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Mahkameh Moshfeghi; Soodabeh Sadat Sajadi; Sepideh Sajadi; Majid Shahbazian
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-01-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.