Literature DB >> 19547915

Faithful after break-up: suppression of chromosomal translocations.

Sang Eun Lee1, Kyungjae Myung.   

Abstract

Chromosome integrity in response to chemically or radiation-induced chromosome breaks and the perturbation of ongoing replication forks relies on multiple DNA repair mechanisms. However, repair of these lesions may lead to unwanted chromosome rearrangement if not properly executed or regulated. As these types of chromosomal alterations threaten the cell's and the organism's very own survival, multiple systems are developed to avoid or at least limit break-induced chromosomal rearrangements. In this review, we highlight cellular strategies for repressing DNA break-induced chromosomal translocations in multiple model systems including yeast, mouse, and human. These pathways select proper homologous templates or broken DNA ends for the faithful repair of DNA breaks to avoid undesirable chromosomal translocations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19547915      PMCID: PMC3501963          DOI: 10.1007/s00018-009-0068-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  127 in total

1.  Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge.

Authors:  Stephan Gruber; Prakash Arumugam; Yuki Katou; Daria Kuglitsch; Wolfgang Helmhart; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break.

Authors:  Lena Ström; Charlotte Karlsson; Hanna Betts Lindroos; Sara Wedahl; Yuki Katou; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Camilla Sjögren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  ATM prevents the persistence and propagation of chromosome breaks in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Elsa Callén; Mila Jankovic; Simone Difilippantonio; Jeremy A Daniel; Hua-Tang Chen; Arkady Celeste; Manuela Pellegrini; Kevin McBride; Danny Wangsa; Andrea L Bredemeyer; Barry P Sleckman; Thomas Ried; Michel Nussenzweig; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Chromosome segregation and double-strand break repair - a complex connection.

Authors:  Lena Ström; Camilla Sjögren
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Evi Soutoglou; Jonas F Dorn; Kundan Sengupta; Maria Jasin; Andre Nussenzweig; Thomas Ried; Gaudenz Danuser; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Kelly VanHulle; Francene J Lemoine; Vidhya Narayanan; Brandon Downing; Krista Hull; Christy McCullough; Melissa Bellinger; Kirill Lobachev; Thomas D Petes; Anna Malkova
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mus81 cleavage of Holliday junctions: a failsafe for processing meiotic recombination intermediates?

Authors:  Louise J Gaskell; Fekret Osman; Robert J C Gilbert; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Role of Dnl4-Lif1 in nonhomologous end-joining repair complex assembly and suppression of homologous recombination.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Melissa L Hefferin; Ling Chen; Eun Yong Shim; Hui-Min Tseng; Youngho Kwon; Patrick Sung; Sang Eun Lee; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-24       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Davide Mantiero; Michela Clerici; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination.

Authors:  Giacomo De Piccoli; Felipe Cortes-Ledesma; Gregory Ira; Jordi Torres-Rosell; Stefan Uhle; Sarah Farmer; Ji-Young Hwang; Felix Machin; Audrey Ceschia; Alexandra McAleenan; Violeta Cordon-Preciado; Andrés Clemente-Blanco; Felip Vilella-Mitjana; Pranav Ullal; Adam Jarmuz; Beatriz Leitao; Debra Bressan; Farokh Dotiwala; Alma Papusha; Xiaolan Zhao; Kyungjae Myung; James E Haber; Andrés Aguilera; Luis Aragón
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-06       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  6 in total

1.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks.

Authors:  Eun Yong Shim; Woo-Hyun Chung; Matthew L Nicolette; Yu Zhang; Melody Davis; Zhu Zhu; Tanya T Paull; Grzegorz Ira; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  De novo telomere formation is suppressed by the Mec1-dependent inhibition of Cdc13 accumulation at DNA breaks.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Presence of a functional (TTAGG)(n) telomere-telomerase system in aphids.

Authors:  Valentina Monti; Monica Giusti; Davide Bizzaro; Gian Carlo Manicardi; Mauro Mandrioli
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Parameters affecting telomere-mediated chromosomal truncation in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Andrew D Nelson; Jonathan C Lamb; Pierre S Kobrossly; Dorothy E Shippen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 5.  Multiple cellular mechanisms prevent chromosomal rearrangements involving repetitive DNA.

Authors:  Carolyn M George; Eric Alani
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 6.  Heavy ions, radioprotectors and genomic instability: implications for human space exploration.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Dziegielewski; Wilfried Goetz; Janet E Baulch
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 1.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.