BACKGROUND: The choice of study type is an important aspect of the design of medical studies. The study design and consequent study type are major determinants of a study's scientific quality and clinical value. METHODS: This article describes the structured classification of studies into two types, primary and secondary, as well as a further subclassification of studies of primary type. This is done on the basis of a selective literature search concerning study types in medical research, in addition to the authors' own experience. RESULTS: Three main areas of medical research can be distinguished by study type: basic (experimental), clinical, and epidemiological research. Furthermore, clinical and epidemiological studies can be further subclassified as either interventional or noninterventional. CONCLUSIONS: The study type that can best answer the particular research question at hand must be determined not only on a purely scientific basis, but also in view of the available financial resources, staffing, and practical feasibility (organization, medical prerequisites, number of patients, etc.).
BACKGROUND: The choice of study type is an important aspect of the design of medical studies. The study design and consequent study type are major determinants of a study's scientific quality and clinical value. METHODS: This article describes the structured classification of studies into two types, primary and secondary, as well as a further subclassification of studies of primary type. This is done on the basis of a selective literature search concerning study types in medical research, in addition to the authors' own experience. RESULTS: Three main areas of medical research can be distinguished by study type: basic (experimental), clinical, and epidemiological research. Furthermore, clinical and epidemiological studies can be further subclassified as either interventional or noninterventional. CONCLUSIONS: The study type that can best answer the particular research question at hand must be determined not only on a purely scientific basis, but also in view of the available financial resources, staffing, and practical feasibility (organization, medical prerequisites, number of patients, etc.).
Entities:
Keywords:
basic research; clinical research; epidemiology; literature search; study type
Authors: Catherine D Deangelis; Jeffrey M Drazen; Frank A Frizelle; Charlotte Haug; John Hoey; Richard Horton; Sheldon Kotzin; Christine Laine; Ana Marusic; A John P M Overbeke; Torben V Schroeder; Hal C Sox; Martin B Van Der Weyden Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Maria Blettner; Hajo Zeeb; Anssi Auvinen; Terri J Ballard; Massimiliano Caldora; Harald Eliasch; Maryanne Gundestrup; Tor Haldorsen; Niklas Hammar; Gaël P Hammer; David Irvine; Ingo Langner; Alexandra Paridou; Eero Pukkala; Vilhjálmur Rafnsson; Hans Storm; Hrafn Tulinius; Ulf Tveten; Anastasia Tzonou Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2003-10-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Ida Sim; Samson W Tu; Simona Carini; Harold P Lehmann; Brad H Pollock; Mor Peleg; Knut M Wittkowski Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 6.317