Literature DB >> 19546882

Lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand?

J L Silberstein1, I H Derweesh, C J Kane.   

Abstract

Since the initial report of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in 2001, the technique has gained rapid acceptance and utilization. When compared with more traditional forms of surgical intervention, there is still much debate with respect to cost, and impact on potency and continence. Less often is the focus on oncologic outcomes. Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of prostatectomy is an important part of the surgical intervention for prostate cancer and is currently underreported during robotic procedures. Herein, we review the current controversies on the value and extent of PLND and the status of emerging data regarding robot-assisted PLND.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19546882     DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2009.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  9 in total

1.  Preoperative sentinel lymph node mapping of the prostate using PET/CT fusion imaging and Ga-68-labeled tilmanocept in an animal model.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane; Salman Farchshchi-Heydari; Claude M James; Christopher H Davis; Anne M Wallace; Carl K Hoh; David R Vera
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Prostate cancer: risk versus benefit of lymph node dissection during prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Michael A Liss
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Pelvic lymph node dissection for patients with elevated risk of lymph node invasion during radical prostatectomy: comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted procedures.

Authors:  Jonathan L Silberstein; Andrew J Vickers; Nicholas E Power; Raul O Parra; Jonathan A Coleman; Rodrigo Pinochet; Karim A Touijer; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Vincent P Laudone
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew H Feifer; Elena B Elkin; William T Lowrance; Brian Denton; Lindsay Jacks; David S Yee; Jonathan A Coleman; Vincent P Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Role of pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging in staging of prostate cancer specifically in patients diagnosed with clinically locally advanced tumours by digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Evanguelos Xylinas; David R Yates; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Elise Seringe; Jean-Claude Bousquet; Eva Comperat; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Philippe Grenier; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Role of surgery in high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  N Lawrentschuk; G Trottier; C Kuk; A R Zlotta
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  A receptor-targeted fluorescent radiopharmaceutical for multireporter sentinel lymph node imaging.

Authors:  Derek K Emerson; Karl K Limmer; David J Hall; Sung-Ho Han; William C Eckelman; Christopher J Kane; Anne M Wallace; David R Vera
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: technical considerations and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2011-09-25

9.  Overall rate, location, and predictive factors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Gu Kang; Oscar Schatloff; Abdul Muhsin Haidar; Srinivas Samavedi; Kenneth J Palmer; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.