Literature DB >> 19546377

Amplification of the pressure pulse in the upper limb in healthy, middle-aged men and women.

Patrick Segers1, Dries Mahieu, Jan Kips, Ernst Rietzschel, Marc De Buyzere, Dirk De Bacquer, Sofie Bekaert, Guy De Backer, Thierry Gillebert, Pascal Verdonck, Luc Van Bortel.   

Abstract

Central-to-peripheral amplification of the pressure pulse leads to discrepancies between central and brachial blood pressures. This amplification depends on an individual's hemodynamic and (patho)physiological characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude and correlates of central-to-peripheral amplification in the upper limb in a healthy, middle-aged population (the Asklepios Study). Carotid, brachial, and radial pressure waveforms were acquired noninvasively using applanation tonometry in 1873 subjects (895 women) aged 35 to 55 years. Carotid, brachial, and radial pulse pressures were calculated, as well as the absolute and relative (with carotid pulse pressure as reference) amplifications. With subjects classified per semidecade of age, carotid-to-radial amplification varied from approximately 25% in the youngest men to 8% in the oldest women. Amplification was higher in men (20+/-14%) than in women (13+/-12%; P<0.001) and decreased with age (P<0.001) in both. Amplification over the brachial-to-radial path contributed substantially to the total amplification. In univariate analysis, the strongest correlation was found with the carotid augmentation index (-0.51 in women; -0.47 in men; both P<0.001). In a multiple linear regression model with carotid-to-radial amplification as the dependent variable, carotid augmentation index, total arterial compliance, and heart rate were identified as the 3 major determinants of upper limb pressure amplification (R2=0.36). We conclude that, in healthy middle-aged subjects, the central-to-radial amplification of the pressure pulse is substantial. Amplification is higher in men than in women, decreases with age, and is primarily associated with the carotid augmentation index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19546377     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.133009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  45 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive studies of central aortic pressure.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Audrey Adji
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Relationship between thigh muscle mass and augmented pressure from wave reflections in healthy adults.

Authors:  Jeremy P Loenneke; Christopher A Fahs; Kevin S Heffernan; Lindy M Rossow; Robert S Thiebaud; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The T-Line TL-200 system for continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement in medical intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Florian Fassio; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Agnes S Meidert; Roland M Schmid; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification.

Authors:  Isabelle Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan Kips; Sebastian Vermeersch; Luc Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure and analysis of pulse waves by applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Paolo Salvi; Andrea Grillo; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Changes in pulse pressure following fluid loading: a comparison between aortic root (non-invasive tonometry) and femoral artery (invasive recordings).

Authors:  Nicolas Dufour; Denis Chemla; Jean-Louis Teboul; Xavier Monnet; Christian Richard; David Osman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Pulse wave amplitude is associated with brachial artery diameter: implications for gender differences in microvascular function.

Authors:  Kevin S Heffernan; Richard H Karas; Paula J Mooney; Ayan R Patel; Jeffrey T Kuvin
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.239

8.  Pulsatile Load Components, Resistive Load and Incident Heart Failure: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Payman Zamani; Scott M Lilly; Patrick Segers; David R Jacobs; David A Bluemke; Daniel A Duprez; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 5.712

9.  Acute effect of static exercise on the cardiovascular system: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Josep M Alegret; Raúl Beltrán-Debón; Andre La Gerche; Luis Franco-Bonafonte; Francisco Rubio-Pérez; Nahum Calvo; Manuel Montero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Does Measurement of Central Blood Pressure have Treatment Consequences in the Clinical Praxis?

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.