Literature DB >> 19542090

Representations of single and compound stimuli in negative and positive patterning.

Justin A Harris1, Saba Gharaei, Clinton A Moore.   

Abstract

In four experiments, rats were trained on different patterning discriminations before being tested with compounds composed of novel combinations of the trained stimuli. In Experiment 1, rats were trained on a negative-patterning schedule (A+ B+ AB-) intermixed with reinforced presentations of a second compound (CD+). On a subsequent test, the rats responded more to two novel compounds, AC and BD, than to A and B, but less than to CD. In Experiment 2, rats were trained on two concurrent negative-patterning discriminations (A+ B+ AB-, C+ D+ CD-). On test, they responded more to AC and BD than to AB and CD, but less than to the single stimuli. In Experiment 3, rats were trained on two concurrent positive-patterning discriminations (A- B- AB+, C- D- CD+). On test, their response rates to AC and BD were not different from the response rates to the trained compounds (AB and CD). Finally, in Experiment 4, rats were trained on a positive- and negative-patterning discrimination concurrently. Once again, on test, response rates to AC and BD were not different from responding on reinforced trials of the trained discriminations (A+, B+, and CD+). We discuss the implications of these findings for elemental and configural models of stimulus representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19542090     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.3.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  16 in total

1.  Context-sensitive elemental theory.

Authors:  Allan R Wagner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-02

2.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

3.  Conditions favoring superconditioning of irrelevant conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas A Williams; Rick Mehta; Jamie-Lynne Dumont
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

4.  Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning.

Authors:  Justin A Harris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Resistance to interference in complex negative patterning.

Authors:  Douglas A Willams; Jennifer D Gawel; Rick Mehta; S Reimer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  How the associative strengths of stimuli combine in compound: summation and overshadowing.

Authors:  Thida Thein; R Frederick Westbrook; Justin A Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01

7.  A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.

Authors:  R R BUSH; F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  "Configural" conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-05

9.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model.

Authors:  J M Pearce
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  P Ivan Pavlov
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2010-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Superior ambiguous occasion setting with visual than temporal feature stimuli.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater; Rifka C Derman; Justin A Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  An attention-modulated associative network.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  On the nature of CS and US representations in Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Learning history and cholinergic modulation in the dorsal hippocampus are necessary for rats to infer the status of a hidden event.

Authors:  Cynthia D Fast; M Melissa Flesher; Nathanial A Nocera; Michael S Fanselow; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Excitatory, inhibitory, and structural plasticity produce correlated connectivity in random networks trained to solve paired-stimulus tasks.

Authors:  Mark A Bourjaily; Paul Miller
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  An elemental model of retrospective revaluation without within-compound associations.

Authors:  Patrick C Connor; Vincent M Lolordo; Thomas P Trappenberg
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.926

7.  Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Guido De Filippo; Angus B Inkster; Stephen E G Lea; Jan De Houwer; Rudi D'Hooge; Tom Beckers; Andy J Wills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Olfactory learning without the mushroom bodies: Spiking neural network models of the honeybee lateral antennal lobe tract reveal its capacities in odour memory tasks of varied complexities.

Authors:  HaDi MaBouDi; Hideaki Shimazaki; Martin Giurfa; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.