Literature DB >> 18248122

How the associative strengths of stimuli combine in compound: summation and overshadowing.

Thida Thein1, R Frederick Westbrook, Justin A Harris.   

Abstract

When two conditioned stimuli (CSs) are presented in compound, the response is typically stronger than to the individual CSs, implying that their associative strengths combine. However, to identify exactly how associative strengths combine requires an accurate description of the relationship between associative strength and responding. The authors have used the delta rule (Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) to constrain the predicted growth of associative strength (V) to identify the relationship between V and responding across the course of Pavlovian conditioning of two CSs (one auditory, one visual). Responding to the compound was best predicted as 0.6xV(CS1)+0.6xV(CS2), suggesting that only 60% of the associative strength of each CS generalized to the compound. A second experiment confirmed this result and additionally showed that summation of responding between two same-modality CSs (both auditory or both visual) declined across training. A third experiment applied the procedure to compound conditioning, showing that responding to the compound was equal to the sum of the response rates to the individual CSs. The results are discussed in terms of configural and elemental models of Pavlovian conditioning. Copyright (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18248122     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.1.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  9 in total

1.  An attention-modulated associative network.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Evan J Livesey
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Normalization between stimulus elements in a model of Pavlovian conditioning: showjumping on an elemental horse.

Authors:  Anna Thorwart; Evan J Livesey; Justin A Harris
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Time and Associative Learning.

Authors:  Peter D Balsam; Michael R Drew; C R Gallistel
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2010

4.  Subsampling of cues in associative learning.

Authors:  Omar D Perez; Edgar H Vogel; Sanjay Narasiwodeyar; Fabian A Soto
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.699

5.  Social reinstatement: a rat model of peer-induced relapse.

Authors:  Virginia G Weiss; Justin R Yates; Joshua S Beckmann; Lindsey R Hammerslag; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Representations of single and compound stimuli in negative and positive patterning.

Authors:  Justin A Harris; Saba Gharaei; Clinton A Moore
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  A Behavioral and Biological Analysis of Aesthetics: Implications for Research and Applications.

Authors:  Francis Mechner
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2017-06-19

8.  The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  Bryan F Singer; Myranda A Bryan; Pavlo Popov; Raymond Scarff; Cody Carter; Erin Wright; Brandon J Aragona; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Failures to replicate blocking are surprising and informative-Reply to Soto (2018).

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Yannick Boddez; Joaquín Matías Alfei Palloni; Rudi D'Hooge; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.