BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence links higher circulating asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) to greater risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Relatively small differences in ADMA concentrations between healthy individuals and those with disease underscore the need to formulate reference intervals that may aid risk stratification of individuals. METHODS: We formulated reference intervals for plasma ADMA concentrations using a community-based reference sample from the Framingham Offspring Study consisting of 1126 nonsmoking individuals [mean (SD) age 56 (9) years; 60% women] who were free of clinical CVD, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity and who attended a routine examination at which ADMA was assayed. ADMA concentrations were determined using a validated tandem mass spectrometry-liquid chromatography assay. RESULTS: In the study sample, the mean ADMA concentration was 0.52 (0.11) micromol/L, and the reference limits were 0.311 and 0.732 (2.5th and 97.5th percentile). The sex-specific reference limits were 0.310 and 0.745 in men and 0.313 and 0.721 micromol/L in women. In multivariable regression analysis, ADMA plasma concentrations were positively correlated with age and total plasma homocysteine (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reference limits calculated for circulating ADMA in our large community-based healthy reference sample confirm the previous observation of a relatively narrow distribution of concentrations. This suggests a tight physiological control of ADMA plasma concentrations, presumably by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) metabolism of ADMA.
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence links higher circulating asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) to greater risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Relatively small differences in ADMA concentrations between healthy individuals and those with disease underscore the need to formulate reference intervals that may aid risk stratification of individuals. METHODS: We formulated reference intervals for plasma ADMA concentrations using a community-based reference sample from the Framingham Offspring Study consisting of 1126 nonsmoking individuals [mean (SD) age 56 (9) years; 60% women] who were free of clinical CVD, hypertension, diabetes, and obesity and who attended a routine examination at which ADMA was assayed. ADMA concentrations were determined using a validated tandem mass spectrometry-liquid chromatography assay. RESULTS: In the study sample, the mean ADMA concentration was 0.52 (0.11) micromol/L, and the reference limits were 0.311 and 0.732 (2.5th and 97.5th percentile). The sex-specific reference limits were 0.310 and 0.745 in men and 0.313 and 0.721 micromol/L in women. In multivariable regression analysis, ADMA plasma concentrations were positively correlated with age and total plasma homocysteine (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reference limits calculated for circulating ADMA in our large community-based healthy reference sample confirm the previous observation of a relatively narrow distribution of concentrations. This suggests a tight physiological control of ADMA plasma concentrations, presumably by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) metabolism of ADMA.
Authors: Jan T Kielstein; Rainer H Böger; Stefanie M Bode-Böger; Jürgen C Frölich; Hermann Haller; Eberhard Ritz; Danilo Fliser Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Marinka S Post; Marieke O Verhoeven; Marius J van der Mooren; Peter Kenemans; Coen D A Stehouwer; Tom Teerlink Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Rainer H Böger; Lisa M Sullivan; Edzard Schwedhelm; Thomas J Wang; Renke Maas; Emelia J Benjamin; Friedrich Schulze; Vanessa Xanthakis; Ralf A Benndorf; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Markus C Stühlinger; Roberta K Oka; Eric E Graf; Isabella Schmölzer; Barbara M Upson; Om Kapoor; Andrzej Szuba; M Rene Malinow; Thomas C Wascher; Otmar Pachinger; John P Cooke Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-08-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ramachandran S Vasan; Alexa Beiser; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy; Jacob Selhub; Paul F Jacques; Irwin H Rosenberg; Peter W F Wilson Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-03-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; Eric P Leip; Thomas J Wang; Peter W F Wilson; Daniel Levy Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-09-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ramachandran S Vasan; Lisa M Sullivan; Ronenn Roubenoff; Charles A Dinarello; Tamara Harris; Emelia J Benjamin; Douglas B Sawyer; Daniel Levy; Peter W F Wilson; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-03-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel Appel; Miriam Seeberger; Edzard Schwedhelm; Patrick Czorlich; Alwin E Goetz; Rainer H Böger; Juliane Hannemann Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Nicole Lüneburg; Patricia Siques; Julio Brito; Juan José De La Cruz; Fabiola León-Velarde; Juliane Hannemann; Cristian Ibanez; Rainer H Böger Journal: High Alt Med Biol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 1.981
Authors: Rushi V Parikh; Rebecca Scherzer; Carl Grunfeld; Elaine M Nitta; Anna Leone; Jeffrey N Martin; Steven G Deeks; Peter Ganz; Priscilla Y Hsue Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Michaela Pekarova; Lukas Kubala; Hana Martiskova; Ivana Papezikova; Stanislava Kralova; Stephan Baldus; Anna Klinke; Radoslav Kuchta; Jaroslav Kadlec; Zdenka Kuchtova; Hana Kolarova; Antonin Lojek Journal: Immunol Res Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.829
Authors: Jason V Baker; Jacqueline Neuhaus; Daniel Duprez; Matthew Freiberg; Jose I Bernardino; Andrew D Badley; Daniel E Nixon; Jens D Lundgren; Russell P Tracy; James D Neaton Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kathy K Griendling; Rhian M Touyz; Jay L Zweier; Sergey Dikalov; William Chilian; Yeong-Renn Chen; David G Harrison; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-07-14 Impact factor: 17.367