Literature DB >> 1954161

Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the guilty knowledge test.

D T Lykken1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of polygraphic lie detection in real life applications is very little better than chance. Yet, at least in the United States, many agencies and the polygraphers themselves have great faith in the technique. The reasons why polygraph examiners, and their clients, genuinely believe in the myth of the polygraph are explained and illustrated. A more plausible method of polygraphic interrogation, the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), is described and it is shown how the GKT, but not the lie test, might have resolved doubts about the case of Demjanjuk, the alleged "Ivan the Terrible."

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1954161     DOI: 10.1007/bf02912513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci        ISSN: 1053-881X


  6 in total

1.  Validity of the guilty-knowledge technique: the effects of motivation.

Authors:  P O Davidson
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1968-02

2.  The effect of selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records.

Authors:  F Horvath
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1977-04

3.  Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception.

Authors:  M T Bradley; J F Warfield
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception.

Authors:  J A Podlesny; D C Raskin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Effects of diazepam and methylphenidate on the electrodermal detection of guilty knowledge.

Authors:  W G Iacono; G A Boisvenu; J A Fleming
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1984-05

6.  Effect of feedback of physiological information on responses to innocent associations and guilty knowledge.

Authors:  R M Stern; J P Breen; T Watanabe; B S Perry
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1981-12
  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Alice-in-Wonderland terminological usage in, and communicational concerns about, that peculiarly American flight of technological fancy. The CQT polygraph.

Authors:  J J Furedy
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep

2.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Elizabeth A Phelps; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; Jane Campbell Moriarty
Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law       Date:  2013-05-01

4.  Neural correlates of anxiety under interrogation in guilt or innocence contexts.

Authors:  Sole Yoo; Hanseul H Choi; Hae-Yoon Choi; Sungjae Yun; Haeil Park; Hyunseok Bahng; Hyunki Hong; Heesong Kim; Hae-Jeong Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.