Literature DB >> 19540706

Primary stenting of the superficial femoral and popliteal artery.

David D Dearing1, Kaushal R Patel, John M Compoginis, Mary A Kamel, Fred A Weaver, Steven G Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Over the last decade, the number of endovascular procedures performed on the superficial femoral (SFA) and popliteal arteries (PA) has significantly increased. There is no consensus on the optimal form of intervention used in this arterial segment. While some have advocated balloon angioplasty alone, others have championed either selective or primary stenting of these lesions. It is the purpose of this study to determine the efficacy and durability of primary stenting of the superficial femoral and popliteal artery.
METHODS: All patients undergoing peripheral angioplasty by a single vascular surgeon were prospectively enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, primary-stenting protocol. During a 44-month period, all patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the SFA or PA also received primary arterial stenting with bare, self-expanding nitinol stents. Patient demographics and risk factors were identified. TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC) classifications were determined for all lesions. Loss of primary patency was said to have occurred when an occlusion or a 50% or greater stenosis in any treated arterial segment was diagnosed by arterial duplex or angiography. Only time to loss of primary patency was recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and differences between groups tested by log rank method.
RESULTS: Between January 16, 2004 and August 13, 2007, 201 angioplasties with primary stenting were performed on 161 patients. One hundred twenty-three stents were placed for claudication, and 78 for critical limb ischemia. Forty-six segments treated were TASC A, 82 were TASC B, 38 were TASC C, and 35 were TASC D. Patient follow-up ranged from three to 1329 days (mean: 426 days). Primary patency rates for TASC A and B lesions were 79%, 67%, and 57% at 12, 24, and 36 months. For TASC C and D lesions, primary patency rates were 52.7%, 36%, and 19% at the same time intervals. Primary patency rates for TASC A and B lesions were significantly higher than for C and D lesions (P < .001). The limb salvage rate was 88.5% in patients with critical limb ischemia. Distal runoff did not influence patency (P = .827).
CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting of the SFA and PA provides durable results in patients with TASC A and B lesions and may be an effective treatment strategy. This approach is significantly less effective when used in treating those with TASC C and D disease. Based on the results in this series, the use of primary stenting does not extend the anatomic limits of the current treatment recommendations for catheter-based intervention in patients with infrainguinal occlusive disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540706     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  12 in total

1.  Improved detection of in-stent restenosis by blood pool agent-enhanced, high-resolution, steady-state magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Christina M Plank; Florian Wolf; Herbert Langenberger; Michael Weber; Dietrich Beitzke; Alfred Stadler; Martin Schillinger; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Early results with LifeStent implantation in RESILIENT and non-RESILIENT inclusion criteria patients.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; John E Campbell; Rashi Fischer; David Phang; Stephanie N Thompson; Neil Dippel; Albeir Mousa
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 3.  Contemporary treatment for critical ischemia: the evidence for interventional radiology or surgery.

Authors:  Keith Hussey; Sivanathan Chandramohan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Long-term results of open and endovascular revascularization of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

Authors:  Salvatore T Scali; Eva M Rzucidlo; Aja A Bjerke; David H Stone; Daniel B Walsh; Philip P Goodney; Catherine K Chang; Richard J Powell
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Ten years after arterial bypass surgery for claudication: venous bypass is the primary procedure for TASC C and D lesions.

Authors:  Thomas Eugster; Regula Marti; Lorenz Gurke; Peter Stierli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Sex Differences in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Maria Pabon; Susan Cheng; S Elissa Altin; Sanjum S Sethi; Michael D Nelson; Kerrie L Moreau; Naomi Hamburg; Connie N Hess
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 23.213

7.  Comparison of immediate and 2-year outcomes between excimer laser-assisted angioplasty with spot stent and primary stenting in intermediate to long femoropopliteal disease.

Authors:  Tien-Yu Wu; Hsin-Hua Chou; Shang-Hung Chang; Yueh-Ju Tsai; Chien-An Hsieh; Shih-Tsung Cheng; Kuan-Hung Yeh; Hern-Jia Chang; Yu-Lin Ko; Hsuan-Li Huang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-05

8.  Comparison between superficial femoral artery stenting and bypass surgery in severe lower-limb ischaemia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J Islam; J V Robbs
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.167

9.  A single stent strategy in patients with lifestyle limiting claudication: 3-year results from the Durability II trial.

Authors:  Krishna J Rocha-Singh; Marc Bosiers; Greg Schultz; Michael R Jaff; Manish Mehta; Jon S Matsumura
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Relationship Between Lipoprotein(a) and Angiographic Severity of Femoropopliteal Lesions.

Authors:  Koji Yanaka; Hirokuni Akahori; Takahiro Imanaka; Kojiro Miki; Nagataka Yoshihara; Toshio Kimura; Takamasa Tanaka; Masanori Asakura; Masaharu Ishihara
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.