Literature DB >> 21620611

Long-term results of open and endovascular revascularization of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

Salvatore T Scali1, Eva M Rzucidlo, Aja A Bjerke, David H Stone, Daniel B Walsh, Philip P Goodney, Catherine K Chang, Richard J Powell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-line treatment for patients with superficial femoral arterial (SFA) occlusive disease has yet to be determined. This study compared long-term outcomes between primary SFA stent placement and primary femoral-popliteal bypass. Periprocedural patient factors were examined to determine their effect on these results.
METHODS: All femoral-popliteal bypasses and SFA interventions performed in consecutive patients with symptoms Rutherford 3 to 6 between 2001 and 2008 were reviewed. Time-dependent outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards were performed to determine predictors of graft patency. Multivariate analysis was completed to identify patient covariates most often associated with the primary therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 152 limbs in 141 patients (66% male; mean age, 66 ± 22 years) underwent femoral-popliteal bypass, and 233 limbs in 204 patients (49% male; mean age, 70 ± 11 years) underwent SFA interventions. Four-year primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 69%, 78%, and 83%, respectively, for bypass patients and 66%, 91%, and 95%, respectively, for SFA interventions. Six-year limb salvage was 80% for bypass vs 92% for stenting (P = .04). Critical limb ischemia (CLI) and renal insufficiency were predictors of bypass failure. Claudication was a predictor of success for SFA stenting. Three-year limb salvage rates for CLI patients undergoing surgery and SFA stenting were 83%. Amputation-free survival at 3 years for CLI patients was 55% for bypass and 59% for SFA interventions. Multivariate predictors (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals) of covariates most frequently associated with first-line SFA stenting were TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II A and B lesions (5.9 [3.4-9.1], P < .001), age >70 years (2.1 [1.4-3.1], P < .001), and claudication (1.7 [1.1-2.7], P = .01). Regarding bypass as first-line therapy, claudicant patients were more likely to have nondiabetic status (5.6 [3.3-9.4], P < .001), creatinine <1.8 mg/dL (4.6 [1.5-14.9], P = .01), age <70 years (2.7 [CI, 1.6-8.3], P < .001), and presence of an above-knee popliteal artery target vessel (1.9 [CI, 1.1-3.4] P = .02).
CONCLUSION: Indication, patient-specific covariates, and anatomic lesion classification have significant association when determining surgeon selection of SFA stenting or femoral-popliteal bypass as first-line therapy. Patients with SFA disease can have comparable long-term results when treatment options are well matched to patient-specific and anatomic characteristics.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620611      PMCID: PMC5292274          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  21 in total

1.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).

Authors:  L Norgren; W R Hiatt; J A Dormandy; M R Nehler; K A Harris; F G R Fowkes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Contemporary management of peripheral arterial disease: III. Endovascular and surgical management.

Authors:  Amjad Almahameed; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.321

3.  Subintimal angioplasty with the aid of a re-entry device for TASC C and D lesions of the SFA.

Authors:  C Setacci; E Chisci; G de Donato; F Setacci; F Iacoponi; G Galzerano
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Endovascular surgery for chronic limb ischaemia. Factors predicting immediate outcome on the basis of a nationwide vascular registry.

Authors:  E Vainio; J P Salenius; M Lepäntalo; M Luther; K Ylönen
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  2001

5.  Primary patency of long-segment self-expanding nitinol stents in the femoropopliteal arteries.

Authors:  Schila Sabeti; Wolfgang Mlekusch; Jasmin Amighi; Erich Minar; Martin Schillinger
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery.

Authors:  Martin Schillinger; Schila Sabeti; Christian Loewe; Petra Dick; Jasmin Amighi; Wolfgang Mlekusch; Oliver Schlager; Manfred Cejna; Johannes Lammer; Erich Minar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Limb salvage and survival rates among elderly patients with advanced limb ischemia.

Authors:  T Ohta; M Hosaka; H Ishibashi; I Sugimoto; E Mihara; K Hida; N Takeuchi; J Hachiya; M Kato; H Kazui; Y Nagata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of superficial femoral artery endoluminal interventions.

Authors:  Andrew M Bakken; Eugene Palchik; Joseph P Hart; Jeffrey M Rhodes; Wael E Saad; Mark G Davies
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Stenting vs above knee polytetrafluoroethylene bypass for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus-II C and D superficial femoral artery disease.

Authors:  Hasan H Dosluoglu; Gregory S Cherr; Purandath Lall; Linda M Harris; Maciej L Dryjski
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Contemporary outcomes after superficial femoral artery angioplasty and stenting: the influence of TASC classification and runoff score.

Authors:  Daniel M Ihnat; Son T Duong; Zachary C Taylor; Luis R Leon; Joseph L Mills; Kaoru R Goshima; Jose A Echeverri; Bulent Arslan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  8 in total

1.  Early results with LifeStent implantation in RESILIENT and non-RESILIENT inclusion criteria patients.

Authors:  Patrick A Stone; John E Campbell; Rashi Fischer; David Phang; Stephanie N Thompson; Neil Dippel; Albeir Mousa
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.285

Review 2.  Contemporary treatment for critical ischemia: the evidence for interventional radiology or surgery.

Authors:  Keith Hussey; Sivanathan Chandramohan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Long-Term Results of Endovascular Femoropopliteal Interventions.

Authors:  Robert Hacker; Luke Marone
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-04-06

4.  Outcomes of endovascular lower extremity interventions depend more on indication than physician specialty.

Authors:  Justin R Wallace; Theodore Yuo; Luke Marone; Rabih A Chaer; Michel S Makaroun
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  [Endovascular versus conventional vascular surgery--old-fashioned thinking? Part 2: carotid artery stenosis and peripheral arterial occlusive disease].

Authors:  E S Debus; D Manzoni; C-A Behrendt; F Heidemann; R T Grundmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Comparison between superficial femoral artery stenting and bypass surgery in severe lower-limb ischaemia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J Islam; J V Robbs
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.167

7.  Comparison of hybrid procedure and open surgical revascularization for multilevel infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Dian Huang; Chen Liu; Zhao Liu; Min Zhang; Tong Qiao; Chang-Jian Liu
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Retrospective review of superficial femoral artery stenting in diabetic patients: thiazolidinedione use may decrease reinterventions.

Authors:  Karen L Walker; Daniel B Walsh; Philip P Goodney; Samantha A Connell; David H Stone; Richard J Powell; Eva M Rzucidlo
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.298

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.