Literature DB >> 19540554

Primary frozen section diagnosis by robotic microscopy and virtual slide telepathology: the University Health Network experience.

Andrew J Evans1, Runjan Chetty, Blaise A Clarke, Sidney Croul, Danny M Ghazarian, Tim-Rasmus Kiehl, Bayardo Perez Ordonez, Suganthi Ilaalagan, Sylvia L Asa.   

Abstract

Although telepathology (TP) has not been widely implemented for primary frozen section diagnoses, interest in its use is growing as we move into an age of increasing subspecialization and centralization of pathology services. University Health Network is a 3-site academic institution in downtown Toronto. The pathology department is consolidated at its Toronto General Hospital (TGH) site. The Toronto Western Hospital (TWH), located 1 mile to west of TGH, has no on-site pathologist, and generates 5 to 10 frozen section cases per week. More than 95% of these frozen sections are submitted by neurosurgeons, in most cases to confirm the presence of lesional tissue and establish a tissue diagnosis. In 2004, we implemented a robotic microscopy (RM) TP system to cover these frozen sections. In 2006, we changed to a virtual slide (VS) TP system. Between November 2004 and September 2006, 350 primary frozen section diagnoses were made by RM. An additional 633 have been reported by VS TP since October 2006, giving a total of 983 frozen sections from 790 patients. Of these cases, 88% have been single specimens with total turnaround times averaging 19.98 and 15.68 minutes per case by RM and VS TP, respectively (P < .0001). Pathologists required an average of 9.65 minutes to review a slide by RM. This decreased 4-fold to 2.25 minutes after the change to VS TP (P < .00001). Diagnostic accuracy has been 98% with both modalities, and our overall deferral rate has been 7.7%. Midcase technical failure has occurred in 3 cases (0.3%) resulting in a delay, where a pathologist went to TWH to report the frozen section. Discrepant cases have typically involved minor interpretive errors related to tumor type. None of our discrepant TP diagnoses has had clinical impact to date. We have found TP to be reliable and accurate for frozen section diagnoses. In addition to its superior speed and image quality, the VS approach readily facilitates consultation with colleagues on difficult cases. As a result, there has been greater overall pathologist satisfaction with VS TP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540554     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  39 in total

Review 1.  The Empirical Foundations of Telepathology: Evidence of Feasibility and Intermediate Effects.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Ronald S Weinstein; Matthew R Dunn; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Performance of residents using digital images versus glass slides on certification examination in anatomical pathology: a mixed methods pilot study.

Authors:  Lorna Mirham; Christopher Naugler; Malcolm Hayes; Nadia Ismiil; Annie Belisle; Shachar Sade; Catherine Streutker; Christina MacMillan; Golnar Rasty; Snezana Popovic; Mariamma Joseph; Manal Gabril; Penny Barnes; Richard G Hegele; Beverley Carter; George M Yousef
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-02-25

3.  Re: Barriers and facilitators to adoption of soft copy interpretation from the user perspective: Lessons learned from filmless radiology for slideless pathology. J Pathol Inform, 2011;2:1, Patterson et al.

Authors:  Andrew J Evans
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-02-26

4.  Development and use of a genitourinary pathology digital teaching set for trainee education.

Authors:  Li Li; Bryan J Dangott; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-05-26

Review 5.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Diagnosis of dysplasia in upper gastro-intestinal tract biopsies through digital microscopy.

Authors:  Dorina Gui; Galen Cortina; Bita Naini; Steve Hart; Garrett Gerney; David Dawson; Sarah Dry
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-08-25

7.  The effects of a regional telepathology project: a study protocol.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Trudel; Guy Paré; Bernard Têtu; Claude Sicotte
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Digital images and the future of digital pathology.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-08-10

9.  Digital pathology: Attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology community.

Authors:  Magdaleni Bellis; Shereen Metias; Christopher Naugler; Aaron Pollett; Serge Jothy; George M Yousef
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2013-03-14

10.  Application of whole slide image markup and annotation for pathologist knowledge capture.

Authors:  Walter S Campbell; Kirk W Foster; Steven H Hinrichs
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.