BACKGROUND: Currently, the only function of the resting electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients referred for exercise testing is to determine whether imaging is mandated. It is unknown if subtle ECG findings in those patients with clinically normal resting ECGs have prognostic significance. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study of 18,964 patients without known cardiovascular disease who had a clinically normal resting ECG and who underwent treadmill exercise testing for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease. Eleven quantitative ECG measures relating to heart rate, conduction, left ventricular mass, or repolarization were collected digitally. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The prognostic importance of a composite ECG score was assessed by measuring its impact on the c-index (analogous to area under receiver operating characteristic curve) and by measures of reclassification. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 1,585 patients died. The 4 most predictive digital ECG variables were higher ventricular rate, more leftward QRS axis, more downward ST-segment deviation, and longer QT interval. The ECG score was independently associated with mortality (75th vs 25th percentile hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.49, P < .0001). The ECG score had modest impact on discrimination (change in c-index 0.04) and reclassification of risk (3.0% decrease of relative integrated discrimination improvement, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Subtle ECG findings relating to heart rate, conduction, left ventricular mass, or repolarization in patients with clinically normal ECGs referred for exercise testing may provide modest additional prognostic information over and above clinical and exercise measures.
BACKGROUND: Currently, the only function of the resting electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients referred for exercise testing is to determine whether imaging is mandated. It is unknown if subtle ECG findings in those patients with clinically normal resting ECGs have prognostic significance. METHODS: We performed a single-center cohort study of 18,964 patients without known cardiovascular disease who had a clinically normal resting ECG and who underwent treadmill exercise testing for evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease. Eleven quantitative ECG measures relating to heart rate, conduction, left ventricular mass, or repolarization were collected digitally. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The prognostic importance of a composite ECG score was assessed by measuring its impact on the c-index (analogous to area under receiver operating characteristic curve) and by measures of reclassification. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, 1,585 patients died. The 4 most predictive digital ECG variables were higher ventricular rate, more leftward QRS axis, more downward ST-segment deviation, and longer QT interval. The ECG score was independently associated with mortality (75th vs 25th percentile hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.25-1.49, P < .0001). The ECG score had modest impact on discrimination (change in c-index 0.04) and reclassification of risk (3.0% decrease of relative integrated discrimination improvement, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Subtle ECG findings relating to heart rate, conduction, left ventricular mass, or repolarization in patients with clinically normal ECGs referred for exercise testing may provide modest additional prognostic information over and above clinical and exercise measures.
Authors: Francis J Klocke; Michael G Baird; Beverly H Lorell; Timothy M Bateman; Joseph V Messer; Daniel S Berman; Patrick T O'Gara; Blase A Carabello; Richard O Russell; Manuel D Cerqueira; Martin G St John Sutton; Anthony N DeMaria; James E Udelson; J Ward Kennedy; Mario S Verani; Kim Allan Williams; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jeffrey L Anderson; Loren F Hiratzka; David P Faxon; Sharon Ann Hunt; Valentin Fuster; Alice K Jacobs; Raymond J Gibbons; Richard O Russell Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B L Cedres; K Liu; J Stamler; A R Dyer; R Stamler; D M Berkson; O Paul; M Lepper; H A Lindberg; J Marquardt; E Stevens; J A Schoenberger; R B Shekelle; P Collette; D Garside Journal: Circulation Date: 1982-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Peter M Okin; Richard B Devereux; Markku S Nieminen; Sverker Jern; Lasse Oikarinen; Matti Viitasalo; Lauri Toivonen; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stevo Julius; Steven Snapinn; Björn Dahlöf Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lasse Oikarinen; Markku S Nieminen; Matti Viitasalo; Lauri Toivonen; Sverker Jern; Björn Dahlöf; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-03-22 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lisa VanHoose; Youssef Sawers; Rajprasad Loganathan; James L Vacek; Lisa Stehno-Bittel; Lesya Novikova; Muhammed Al-Jarrah; Irina V Smirnova Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Sami Kokko; Harri Selänne; Lauri Alanko; Olli J Heinonen; Raija Korpelainen; Kai Savonen; Tommi Vasankari; Lasse Kannas; Urho M Kujala; Tuula Aira; Jari Villberg; Jari Parkkari Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2015-09-10
Authors: Christoffer Polcwiartek; Brett D Atwater; Kristian Kragholm; Daniel J Friedman; Carlo A Barcella; Rubina Attar; Claus Graff; Jonas B Nielsen; Adrian Pietersen; Peter Søgaard; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Svend E Jensen Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Heikki Pentikäinen; Kerttu Toivo; Sami Kokko; Lauri Alanko; Olli J Heinonen; Raija Korpelainen; Harri Selänne; Tommi Vasankari; Urho M Kujala; Jari Villberg; Jari Parkkari; Kai Savonen Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 2.860