Literature DB >> 19540332

Bringing toxicology into the 21st century: a global call to action.

T Seidle1, M L Stephens.   

Abstract

Conventional toxicological testing methods are often decades old, costly and low-throughput, with questionable relevance to the human condition. Several of these factors have contributed to a backlog of chemicals that have been inadequately assessed for toxicity. Some authorities have responded to this challenge by implementing large-scale testing programmes. Others have concluded that a paradigm shift in toxicology is warranted. One such call came in 2007 from the United States National Research Council (NRC), which articulated a vision of "21st century toxicology" based predominantly on non-animal techniques. Potential advantages of such an approach include the capacity to examine a far greater number of chemicals and biological outcomes at more relevant exposure levels; a substantial reduction in testing costs, time and animal use; and the grounding of regulatory decisions on human rather than rodent biology. In order for the NRC's and similar proposals to make a significant impact on regulatory toxicology in the foreseeable future, they must be translated into sustained multidisciplinary research programmes that are well co-ordinated and funded on a multinational level. The Humane Society is calling for a "big biology" project to meet this challenge. We are in the process of forging an international, multi-stakeholder consortium dedicated to implementing the NRC vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540332     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  7 in total

1.  Pathways of Toxicity.

Authors:  Andre Kleensang; Alexandra Maertens; Michael Rosenberg; Suzanne Fitzpatrick; Justin Lamb; Scott Auerbach; Richard Brennan; Kevin M Crofton; Ben Gordon; Albert J Fornace; Kevin Gaido; David Gerhold; Robin Haw; Adriano Henney; Avi Ma'ayan; Mary McBride; Stefano Monti; Michael F Ochs; Akhilesh Pandey; Roded Sharan; Rob Stierum; Stuart Tugendreich; Catherine Willett; Clemens Wittwehr; Jianguo Xia; Geoffrey W Patton; Kirk Arvidson; Mounir Bouhifd; Helena T Hogberg; Thomas Luechtefeld; Lena Smirnova; Liang Zhao; Yeyejide Adeleye; Minoru Kanehisa; Paul Carmichael; Melvin E Andersen; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 2.  The future of toxicity testing: a focus on in vitro methods using a quantitative high-throughput screening platform.

Authors:  Sunita J Shukla; Ruili Huang; Christopher P Austin; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Relative sensitivity of fish and mammalian cells to the antibiotic, trimethoprim: cytotoxic and genotoxic responses as determined by neutral red retention, Comet and micronucleus assays.

Authors:  Elena Papis; Simon J Davies; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Tom Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Andre Kleensang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  Perspectives of the development strategies for a future toxicity testing system in China: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Bin Zhao
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Adaptation of high-throughput screening in drug discovery-toxicological screening tests.

Authors:  Paweł Szymański; Magdalena Markowicz; Elżbieta Mikiciuk-Olasik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Application of Gut Cell Models for Toxicological and Bioactivity Studies of Functional and Novel Foods.

Authors:  Martin Trapecar; Avrelija Cencic
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2012-12-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.