Literature DB >> 21104197

Relative sensitivity of fish and mammalian cells to the antibiotic, trimethoprim: cytotoxic and genotoxic responses as determined by neutral red retention, Comet and micronucleus assays.

Elena Papis1, Simon J Davies, Awadhesh N Jha.   

Abstract

Relative cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of a widely used antibiotic, trimethoprim (TRIMP) was evaluated under in vitro conditions using rainbow trout gonad-2 (RTG-2) and Chinese hamster ovary-K1 (CHO-K1) cells. Whilst cytotoxicity was determined using neutral red retention (NRR) assay, the genotoxicity was determined using single cell gel electrophoresis or the Comet assay and cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay. For NRR assay, concentration-dependent cytotoxic effect was observed for both the cell lines (estimated EC(50) values: 671.82 ± 21.78 and 611.6 ± 20.4 μg ml(-1) for RTG-2 and CHO-K1 cells, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two cell lines for this assay. For the Comet assay, standard 6 h exposure to TRIMP did not show any positive response for any of the cell types used. However, 48 h exposure to RTG-2 cells showed a concentration-dependent induction of DNA damage (r = 0.86). The highest concentration of TRIMP used (i.e. 100 μg ml(-1)) showed relatively higher DNA damage, compared to ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS; 1 μg ml(-1) or 8 mM), a reference genotoxic agent, used concurrently. In contrast, 24 h exposure time for CHO-K1 cells did not show any concentration-dependent increase for this assay. For MN assay, a significant correlation was found between the MN induction and TRIMP concentration for both the cell lines (RTG-2: r = 0.68; CHO-K1: r = 0.79), although only the highest concentration used showed a significant increase for binucleated (BN) cell with micronuclei (BNMN). The study suggests that whilst the cells of different origin could exhibit similar cytotoxicity, they could display differential genotoxic effects. Furthermore, genotoxic effects of TRIMP are primarily exposure period dependent phenomena and, in addition to inhibiting the action of dihydrofolate reductase, oxidative stress could also contribute for the observed toxic effects, fish cells in general being more sensitive for genotoxic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104197     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0572-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  57 in total

1.  Detection of mitomycin C-induced genetic damage in fish cells by use of RAPD.

Authors:  C Becerril; M Ferrero; F Sanz; A Castaño
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 2.  A review of the genotoxicity of marketed pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  R D Snyder; J W Green
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Antibiotic prescription rates vary markedly between 13 European countries.

Authors:  Sigvard Mölstad; Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg; Anna-Karin Karlsson; Otto Cars
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  2002

Review 4.  Genotoxicological studies in aquatic organisms: an overview.

Authors:  Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  The use of fish cells in ecotoxicology. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 47.

Authors:  Argelia Castaño; Niels Bols; Thomas Braunbeck; Paul Dierickx; Marlies Halder; Boris Isomaa; Kazumi Kawahara; Lucy E J Lee; Carmel Mothersill; Peter Pärt; Guillermo Repetto; Juan Riego Sintes; Hans Rufli; Richard Smith; Chris Wood; Helmut Segner
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  Bringing toxicology into the 21st century: a global call to action.

Authors:  T Seidle; M L Stephens
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Resistance of bacteria in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  M Chomarat
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.283

8.  Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage.

Authors:  B C Blount; M M Mack; C M Wehr; J T MacGregor; R A Hiatt; G Wang; S N Wickramasinghe; R B Everson; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Human lymphocytes micronucleus assay in Europe. An international survey.

Authors:  J Surrallés; A T Natarajan
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Genetic activity of trimethoprim in the Salmonella/microsomal screening system.

Authors:  S A Rasool; M A Khan; A Z Alvi; M N Umer
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Clarithromycin, trimethoprim, and penicillin and oxidative nucleic acid modifications in humans: randomised, controlled trials.

Authors:  Emil List Larsen; Vanja Cejvanovic; Laura Kofoed Kjaer; Morten Thorup Pedersen; Sara Daugaard Popik; Lina Kallehave Hansen; Jon Traerup Andersen; Espen Jimenez-Solem; Kasper Broedbaek; Morten Petersen; Allan Weimann; Trine Henriksen; Jens Lykkesfeldt; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Henrik Enghusen Poulsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Towards a more representative in vitro method for fish ecotoxicology: morphological and biochemical characterisation of three-dimensional spheroidal hepatocytes.

Authors:  Matthew G Baron; Wendy M Purcell; Simon K Jackson; Stewart F Owen; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Real-time cell analysis: sensitivity of different vertebrate cell cultures to copper sulfate measured by xCELLigence(®).

Authors:  S Rakers; F Imse; M Gebert
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Genotoxic potential of selected cytostatic drugs in human and zebrafish cells.

Authors:  Goran Gajski; Marko Gerić; Bojana Žegura; Matjaž Novak; Jana Nunić; Džejla Bajrektarević; Vera Garaj-Vrhovac; Metka Filipič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Relative sensitivity of two marine bivalves for detection of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects: a field assessment in the Tamar Estuary, South West England.

Authors:  Lorna J Dallas; Victoria V Cheung; Andrew S Fisher; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Potential health impact and genotoxicity analysis of drinking source water from Liuxihe Reservoir (P.R. China).

Authors:  Weili Wang; Mei Li; Yibin Cui; Xiangyu Gao; Kun Chen; Xin Qian
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Toxic effect of nonylphenol on the marine macroalgae Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta): antioxidant system and antitumor activity.

Authors:  Mingqin Zhong; Pinghe Yin; Ling Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Nitric oxide and interleukins are involved in cell proliferation of RAW264.7 macrophages activated by viili exopolysaccharides.

Authors:  Junhua Wu; Mengxian Li; Ling Liu; Qi An; Jinlu Zhang; Jingkai Zhang; Meiling Li; Weigang Duan; Dequan Liu; Zhenjing Li; Cheng Luo
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.092

10.  Direct Measurements of Oxygen Gradients in Spheroid Culture System Using Electron Parametric Resonance Oximetry.

Authors:  Laura M Langan; Nicholas J F Dodd; Stewart F Owen; Wendy M Purcell; Simon K Jackson; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.