Literature DB >> 19540124

Attentional requirements of walking according to the gait phase and onset of auditory stimuli.

G A C Abbud1, K Z H Li, R G DeMont.   

Abstract

A dual-task paradigm was used to examine the influence of an attention demanding cognitive task on each phase of gait. Twenty-three participants (aged 18-27) walked on a treadmill at a 20% increase of their self-selected speed, either alone or while performing a cognitive task. Muscle activity was measured with electromyography (iEMG) for eight muscles of the dominant leg. The cognitive task consisted of subtracting one (EASY) or seven (HARD) from orally presented numbers. Reaction time (RT) and accuracy were recorded. iEMG events were selected according to stimulus onset (0-150 ms, 150-300 ms and 300-450 ms) prior to phases of gait (double-leg stance, single-leg stance and swing). There was a decrease in iEMG amplitude of fibularis longus (p=.013) and a trend in the same direction for vastus lateralis (p=.065) while walking and performing the cognitive task. When stimulus onset was considered, iEMG of medial gastrocnemius (p=.021) and lateral gastrocnemius (p=.004) were reduced during single-leg stance, when stimuli occurred between 300 and 450 ms prior to this phase. Cognitive performance was affected by task difficulty (RT, accuracy) and by dual-task load (RT). Dual-task costs were observed in both the motor and the cognitive tasks, suggesting that walking requires attention. There was a specific moment (300 ms after stimulus onset) during single-leg stance when dual-task costs were most pronounced, corroborating supraspinal involvement in the control of normal walking. Time-based approaches should be considered when analyzing attentional demands of a dynamic task such as gait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540124     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  9 in total

1.  Stability control during the performance of a simultaneous obstacle avoidance and auditory Stroop task.

Authors:  Timothy A Worden; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The contribution of verbalization to action.

Authors:  Jennifer C Gidley Larson; Yana Suchy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-19

3.  Functional implications of muscle co-contraction during gait in advanced age.

Authors:  Justine Lo; On-Yee Lo; Erin A Olson; Daniel Habtemariam; Ikechukwu Iloputaife; Margaret M Gagnon; Brad Manor; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Immediate effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation with tempo changes on gait in stroke patients.

Authors:  Yuri Cha; Young Kim; Yijung Chung
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-04-23

5.  The effect of light touch on balance control during overground walking in healthy young adults.

Authors:  A R Oates; J Unger; C M Arnold; J Fung; J L Lanovaz
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-12-28

6.  Responses of stance leg muscles induced by support surface translation during gait.

Authors:  Shiho Fukuda; Hitoshi Oda; Taku Kawasaki; Yasushi Sawaguchi; Masakazu Matsuoka; Ryo Tsujinaka; Koichi Hiraoka
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-30

7.  Study on Tripping Risks in Fast Walking through Cadence-Controlled Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Fong Wang; Wei-Chih Lien; Che-Yu Liu; Ching-Yu Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Effects of Nonelastic Taping and Dual Task on Kinematics and Kinetics of the Ankle Joint.

Authors:  TaoLi Wang; RongZhou Zhong; ShaSha Liu; GuoJiong Hu; WenXin Niu; YuBin Wang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Changes in Cortical Activity during Preferred and Fast Speed Walking under Single- and Dual-Tasks in the Young-Old and Old-Old Elderly.

Authors:  Jinuk Kim; Gihyoun Lee; Jungsoo Lee; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-11-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.