Literature DB >> 19539714

High-frequency magnetic stimulation induces long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices.

Tursonjan Tokay1, Norman Holl, Timo Kirschstein, Volker Zschorlich, Rüdiger Köhling.   

Abstract

Recent reports indicate that the exposure of brain tissues to transcranial magnetic stimulation induces persistent changes in neuronal activity and influences hippocampal synaptic plasticity. However, the modulation of synaptic efficiency by magnetic stimulation in vitro is still unclear. In the present study, we investigated whether high-frequency magnetic stimulation (HFMS) can induce long-term potentiation (LTP) in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. During baseline recording and after HFMS, field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were recorded within the CA1 stratum radiatum in response to electrical stimulation of the Schaffer collateral inputs. For LTP induction, HFMS was delivered through a circular coil positioned closely above the slices using two different paradigms (A: 10 trains of 20 pulses at 100 Hz with 1s intervals, 5 repetitions with 10s intervals; B: 3 trains of 100 pulses at 100 Hz with 20s intervals). The intensity of the magnetic stimulus was adjusted to 60-75 A/micros. After application of HFMS, electrically evoked CA1 fEPSPs were enhanced showing significant levels of LTP by both paradigms (A: 142+/-9% of baseline, n=6; B: 129+/-7%, n=8). Furthermore, HFMS-induced LTP induced by paradigm A was prevented by the presence of the selective N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) blocker D-AP5 (50 microM) in the bath solution (95+/-6% of the baseline, n=6; p<0.01 compared to control condition without D-AP5). Further, the lack of changes in paired-pulse ratio and the afferent fiber volleys exclude presynaptic involvement in HFMS-induced LTP. In summary, we have demonstrated that HFMS can induce NMDAR-dependent LTP in the CA1 region in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19539714     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  17 in total

Review 1.  Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?

Authors:  Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Enhancing plasticity through repeated rTMS sessions: the benefits of a night of sleep.

Authors:  Daniel A Cohen; Catarina Freitas; Jose Maria Tormos; Lindsay Oberman; Mark Eldaief; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the human neuromuscular system.

Authors:  David A Goss; Richard L Hoffman; Brian C Clark
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Catarina Freitas; Lindsay Oberman; Jared C Horvath; Mark Halko; Mark Eldaief; Shahid Bashir; Marine Vernet; Mouhshin Shafi; Brandon Westover; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Cellular mechanisms underlying state-dependent neural inhibition with magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hui Ye; Vincent Chen; Jenna Hendee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.

Authors:  Fahad A Somaa; Tom A de Graaf; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Multi-scale modeling toolbox for single neuron and subcellular activity under Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Sina Shirinpour; Nicholas Hananeia; James Rosado; Harry Tran; Christos Galanis; Andreas Vlachos; Peter Jedlicka; Gillian Queisser; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  The Impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Reading Processes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  C Nikki Arrington; Alexandra E Ossowski; Humza Baig; Eileen Persichetti; Robin Morris
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.940

9.  Unraveling the cellular and molecular mechanisms of repetitive magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Andreas Vlachos
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Long term delivery of pulsed magnetic fields does not alter visual discrimination learning or dendritic spine density in the mouse CA1 pyramidal or dentate gyrus neurons.

Authors:  Matthew Sykes; Kalina Makowiecki; Jennifer Rodger
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.