Literature DB >> 19538917

Common ground: an investigation of environmental management alcohol prevention initiatives in a college community.

Mark D Wood1, William Dejong, Anne M Fairlie, Doreen Lawson, Andrea M Lavigne, Fran Cohen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article presents an evaluation of Common Ground, a media campaign-supported prevention program featuring increased enforcement, decreased alcohol access, and other environmental management initiatives targeting college student drinking.
METHOD: Phase 1 of the media campaign addressed student resistance to environmentally focused prevention by reporting majority student support for alcohol policy and enforcement initiatives. Phase 2 informed students about state laws, university policies, and environmental initiatives. We conducted student telephone surveys, with samples stratified by gender and year in school, for 4 consecutive years at the intervention campus and 3 years at a comparison campus. We did a series of one-way between-subjects analyses of variance and analyses of covariance, followed by tests of linear trend and planned comparisons. Targeted outcomes included perceptions of enforcement and alcohol availability, alcohol use, and alcohol-impaired driving. We examined archived police reports for student incidents, primarily those resulting from loud parties.
RESULTS: There were increases at the intervention campus in students' awareness of formal alcohol-control efforts and perceptions of the alcohol environment, likelihood of apprehension for underage drinking, consequences for alcohol-impaired driving, and responsible alcohol service practices. There were decreases in the perceived likelihood of other students' negative behavior at off-campus parties. Police-reported incidents decreased over time; however, perceived consequences for off-campus parties decreased. No changes were observed for difficulty finding an off-campus party, self-reported alcohol use, or alcohol-impaired driving.
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention successfully altered perceptions of alcohol enforcement, alcohol access, and the local alcohol environment. This study provides important preliminary information to researchers and practitioners engaged in collaborative prevention efforts in campus communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19538917      PMCID: PMC2701088          DOI: 10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl        ISSN: 1946-5858


  21 in total

1.  A campus-community coalition to control alcohol-related problems off campus: an environmental management case study.

Authors:  T L Gebhardt; K Kaphingst; W DeJong
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2000-03

2.  The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment.

Authors:  R Curtin; S Presser; E Singer
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

3.  Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches.

Authors:  M Couper
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

4.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.

Authors:  S Keeter; C Miller; A Kohut; R M Groves; S Presser
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

5.  Defensively biased responding to risk information among alcohol-using college students.

Authors:  Thad R Leffingwell; Christopher Neumann; Melissa J Leedy; Alison C Babitzke
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Support for alcohol-control policies and enforcement strategies among US college students at 4-year institutions.

Authors:  William Dejong; Laura Gomberg Towvim; Shari Kessel Schneider
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: an update of research findings.

Authors:  Traci L Toomey; Kathleen M Lenk; Alexander C Wagenaar
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.582

8.  Why are sobriety checkpoints not widely adopted as an enforcement strategy in the United States?

Authors:  James C Fell; Susan A Ferguson; Allan F Williams; Michele Fields
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2003-11

9.  Inconsistencies between actual and estimated blood alcohol concentrations in a field study of college students: do students really know how much they drink?

Authors:  Courtney L Kraus; Natasha C Salazar; Jamie R Mitchell; Whitney D Florin; Bob Guenther; David Brady; Scott H Swartzwelder; Aaron M White
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Project ARM: alcohol risk management to prevent sales to underage and intoxicated patrons.

Authors:  T L Toomey; A C Wagenaar; J P Gehan; G Kilian; D M Murray; C L Perry
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2001-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Preventing alcohol use among late adolescent urban youth: 6-year results from a computer-based intervention.

Authors:  Traci M Schwinn; Steven P Schinke
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 2.  College student drinking research from the 1940s to the future: where we have been and where we are going.

Authors:  Jason R Kilmer; Jessica M Cronce; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl       Date:  2014

Review 3.  New research findings since the 2007 Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking: a review.

Authors:  Ralph Hingson; Aaron White
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students.

Authors:  Mark Wolfson; Heather Champion; Thomas P McCoy; Scott D Rhodes; Edward H Ip; Jill N Blocker; Barbara Alvarez Martin; Kimberly G Wagoner; Mary Claire O'Brien; Erin L Sutfin; Ananda Mitra; Robert H Durant
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Response of colleges to risky drinking college students.

Authors:  Nadine R Mastroleo; Diane E Logan
Journal:  R I Med J (2013)       Date:  2014-10-01

6.  Alcohol risk management in college settings: the safer California universities randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert F Saltz; Mallie J Paschall; Richard P McGaffigan; Peter M O Nygaard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  NIAAA's rapid response to college drinking problems initiative: reinforcing the use of evidence-based approaches in college alcohol prevention.

Authors:  William Dejong; Mary E Larimer; Mark D Wood; Roger Hartman
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl       Date:  2009-07

8.  Local Support for Alcohol Control Policies and Perceptions of Neighborhood Issues in Two College Communities.

Authors:  Anne M Fairlie; William DeJong; Mark D Wood
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.716

9.  A Group Randomized Trial of the Stop Service to Obviously-Impaired Patrons (S-STOP) Program to Prevent Overservice in Bars and Restaurants in College Communities.

Authors:  Joel W Grube; Brad S Krevor; William DeJong
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.164

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.