Literature DB >> 19538697

ICU nurses' oral-care practices and the current best evidence.

Freda DeKeyser Ganz1, Naomi Farkash Fink, Ofra Raanan, Miriam Asher, Madeline Bruttin, Maureen Ben Nun, Julie Benbinishty.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the oral-care practices of ICU nurses, to compare those practices with current evidence-based practice, and to determine if the use of evidence-based practice was associated with personal demographic or professional characteristics.
DESIGN: A national survey of oral-care practices of ICU nurses was conducted using a convenience sample of 218 practicing ICU nurses in 2004-05. The survey instrument included questions about demographic and professional characteristics and a checklist of oral-care practices. Nurses rated their perceived level of priority concerning oral care on a scale from 0 to 100. A score was computed representing the sum of 14 items related to equipment, solutions, assessments, and techniques associated with the current best evidence. This score was then statistically analyzed using ANOVA to determine differences of EBP based on demographic and professional characteristics.
FINDINGS: The most commonly used equipment was gauze pads (84%), followed by tongue depressors (55%), and toothbrushes (34%). Chlorhexidine was the most common solution used (75%). Less than half (44%) reported brushing their patients' teeth. The majority performed an oral assessment before beginning oral care (71%); however, none could describe what assessment tool was used. Only 57% of nurses reported documenting their oral care. Nurses rated oral care of intubated patients with a priority of 67+/-27.1. Wide variations were noted within and between units in terms of which techniques, equipment, and solutions were used. No significant relationships were found between the use of an evidence-based protocol and demographic and professional characteristics or with the priority given to oral care.
CONCLUSIONS: While nurses ranked oral care a high priority, many did not implement the latest evidence into their current practice. The level of research utilization was not related to personal or professional characteristics. Therefore attempts should be made to encourage all ICU nurses to introduce and use evidence-based, oral-care protocols. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Practicing ICU nurses in this survey were often not adhering to the latest evidence-based practice and therefore need to be educated and encouraged to do so in order to improve patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19538697     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01264.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh        ISSN: 1527-6546            Impact factor:   3.176


  10 in total

1.  Physicians' and nurses' opinions on selective decontamination of the digestive tract and selective oropharyngeal decontamination: a survey.

Authors:  Irene P Jongerden; Anne Marie G de Smet; Jan A Kluytmans; Leo F te Velde; Paul J Dennesen; Ronald M Wesselink; Martijn P Bouw; Rob Spanjersberg; Diana Bogaers-Hofman; Nardo J van der Meer; Jaap W de Vries; Karin Kaasjager; Mat van Iterson; Georg H Kluge; Tjip S van der Werf; Hubertus I Harinck; Alexander J Bindels; Peter Pickkers; Marc J Bonten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  [Methods for endotracheal tube fixation. Results of a survey of intensive care nurses].

Authors:  O Rothaug; A Müller-Wolff; R Kaltwasser; R Dubb; C Hermes
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Oral Care in Trauma Patients Admitted to the ICU: Viewpoints of ICU Nurses.

Authors:  Seyed Alireza Javadinia; Zahra Kuchi; Alireza Saadatju; Mohsen Tabasi; Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2014-03-18

4.  Intensive care nurses' opinions and practice for oral care of mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery; Akram Ansari; Ismail Azizi-Fini
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01

5.  Awareness among intensive care nurses regarding oral care in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Vidya Priyadharshini Doddasomanahalli Sreenivasan; Aruna Ganganna; Premalatha Bidadi Rajashekaraiah
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

6.  Evaluation of Nurses' Attitude toward the Provision of Oral Hygiene Care to Hospitalized Patients at Two Private Hospitals in South India.

Authors:  Sreenivas Nagarakanti; Joshna Avuluri; Vijay K Chava
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2019-11-07

7.  Cleaning the palate and tongue without nausea: a mixed methods study exploring the appropriate depth and direction of oral care.

Authors:  Yang Cheng; Yu-Feng Zhou; Ya-Ping Ding; Ying Xing; Enfang Shan; Hang Sun
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Knowledge, attitude, and expertise of nurses in intensive care unit regarding oral and dental care in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Abbas Haghighat; Iman Mohammadi; Bahareh Tahani; Farshad Teimoori
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-10-21

9.  Evaluation and Acceptance of an Electric Toothbrush Designed for Dependent Patients.

Authors:  Virginia Prendergast; Kristina M Chapple
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  The Comparison of Chlorhexidine Solution and Swab With Toothbrush and Toothpaste Effect on Preventing Oral Lesions in Hospitalized Patients in Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Zahra Estaji; Mohammad Alinejad; Mohammad Hassan Rakhshani; Mojtaba Rad
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-10-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.