Literature DB >> 19538335

Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: a study in rabbits.

Jaebum Lee1, Janet H Sieweke, Nancy A Rodriguez, Peter Schüpbach, Håkan Lindström, Cristiano Susin, Ulf M E Wikesjö.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to screen candidate nano-technology-modified, micro-structured zirconia implant surfaces relative to local bone formation and osseointegration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Proprietary nano-technology surface-modified (calcium phosphate: CaP) micro-structured zirconia implants (A and C), control micro-structured zirconia implants (ZiUnite), and titanium porous oxide implants (TiUnite) were implanted into the femoral condyle in 40 adult male New Zealand White rabbits. Each animal received one implant in each hind leg; thus, 20 animals received A and C implants and 20 animals received ZiUnite and TiUnite implants in contralateral hind legs. Ten animals/group were euthanized at weeks 3 and 6 when biopsies of the implant sites were processed for histometric analysis using digital photomicrographs produced using backscatter scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: The TiUnite surface demonstrated significantly greater bone-implant contact (BIC) (77.6+/-2.6%) compared with the A (64.6+/-3.6%) and C (62.2+/-3.1%) surfaces at 3 weeks (p<0.05). Numerical differences between ZiUnite (70.5+/-3.1%) and A and C surfaces did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). Similarly, there were non-significant differences between the TiUnite and the ZiUnite surfaces (p>0.05). At 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in BIC between the TiUnite (67.1+/-4.2%), ZiUnite (69.7+/-5.7%), A (68.6+/-1.9%), and C (64.5+/-4.1%) surfaces (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: TiUnite and ZiUnite implant surfaces exhibit high levels of osseointegration that, in this model, confirm their advanced osteoconductive properties. Addition of CaP nano-technology to the ZiUnite surface does not enhance the already advanced osteoconductivity displayed by the TiUnite and ZiUnite implant surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19538335     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  13 in total

1.  The evaluation of prepared microgroove pattern by femtosecond laser on alumina-zirconia nano-composite for endosseous dental implant application.

Authors:  Moluk Aivazi; Mohammad Hossein Fathi; Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Vajihesadat Mortazavi; Batoul HashemiBeni; Jukka Pekka Matinlinna; Omid Savabi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Surface modification of zirconia dental implants by laser texturing.

Authors:  Welson Cunha; Oscar Carvalho; Bruno Henriques; Filipe S Silva; Mutlu Özcan; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Surface Structure of Zirconia Implants: An Integrative Review Comparing Clinical Results with Preclinical and In Vitro Data.

Authors:  Nadja Rohr; Blerta Hoda; Jens Fischer
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Bone tissue response to experimental zirconia implants.

Authors:  Ilja Mihatovic; Vladimir Golubovic; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of peri-implant bone formation around injection-molded and machined surface zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.

Authors:  Hong-Kyun Kim; Kyung Mi Woo; Won-Jun Shon; Jin-Soo Ahn; Seunghee Cha; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  The Effect of UV Treatment on the Osteoconductive Capacity of Zirconia-Based Materials.

Authors:  Miha Brezavšček; Ahmed Fawzy; Maria Bächle; Taskin Tuna; Jens Fischer; Wael Att
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  Effect of Zirconia Dental Implant Surfaces on Bone Integration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ali Hafezeqoran; Roodabeh Koodaryan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  PDLCs and EPCs Co-Cultured on Ta Discs: A Golden Fleece for "Compromised" Osseointegration.

Authors:  Hitesh Chopra; Yuanyuan Han; Cheng F Zhang; Edmond H N Pow
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Evaluation of bone healing on sandblasted and Acid etched implants coated with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite: an in vivo study in rabbit femur.

Authors:  Lory Melin Svanborg; Luiz Meirelles; Victoria Franke Stenport; Per Kjellin; Fredrik Currie; Martin Andersson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-03-02

10.  Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC. A dog study.

Authors:  José L Calvo-Guirado; Antonio Aguilar-Salvatierra; Javier Guardia; Rafael Delgado-Ruiz; María P Ramírez-Fernández; Cristina Pérez Sánchez; Gerardo Gómez-Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2012-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.