Six-coordinated heme groups are involved in a large variety of electron transfer reactions because of their ability to exist in both the ferrous (Fe(2+)) and ferric (Fe(3+)) state without any large differences in structure. Our studies on hemes coordinated by two histidines (bis-His) and hemes coordinated by histidine and methionine (His-Met) will be reviewed. In both of these coordination environments, the heme core can exhibit ferric low spin (electron paramagnetic resonance EPR) signals with large g(max) values (also called Type I, highly anisotropic low spin, or highly axial low spin, HALS species) as well as rhombic EPR (Type II) signals. In bis-His coordinated hemes rhombic and HALS envelopes are related to the orientation of the His groups with respect to each other such that (i) parallel His planes results in a rhombic signal and (ii) perpendicular His planes results in a HALS signal. Correlation between the structure of the heme and its ligands for heme with His-Met axial ligation and ligand-field parameters, as derived from a large series of cytochrome c variants, show, however, that for such a combination of axial ligands there is no clear-cut difference between the large g(max) and the "small g-anisotropy" cases as a result of the relative Met-His arrangements. Nonetheless, a new linear correlation links the average shift delta of the heme methyl groups with the g(max) values.
Six-coordinated n class="Chemical">hemen> groups are involved in a large variety of electron transfer reactions because of their ability to exist in both the ferrous (Fe(2+)) and ferric (Fe(3+)) state without any large differences in structure. Our studies on hemes coordinated by two histidines (bis-His) and hemes coordinated by histidine and methionine (His-Met) will be reviewed. In both of these coordination environments, the heme core can exhibit ferric low spin (electron paramagnetic resonance EPR) signals with large g(max) values (also called Type I, highly anisotropic low spin, or highly axial low spin, HALS species) as well as rhombic EPR (Type II) signals. In bis-His coordinated hemes rhombic and HALS envelopes are related to the orientation of the His groups with respect to each other such that (i) parallel His planes results in a rhombic signal and (ii) perpendicular His planes results in a HALS signal. Correlation between the structure of the heme and its ligands for heme with His-Met axial ligation and ligand-field parameters, as derived from a large series of cytochrome c variants, show, however, that for such a combination of axial ligands there is no clear-cut difference between the large g(max) and the "small g-anisotropy" cases as a result of the relative Met-His arrangements. Nonetheless, a new linear correlation links the average shift delta of the hememethyl groups with the g(max) values.
Authors: Michela G Bertero; Richard A Rothery; Nasim Boroumand; Monica Palak; Francis Blasco; Nicolas Ginet; Joel H Weiner; Natalie C J Strynadka Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2004-12-22 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Damián E Bikiel; Leonardo Boechi; Luciana Capece; Alejandro Crespo; Pablo M De Biase; Santiago Di Lella; Mariano C González Lebrero; Marcelo A Martí; Alejandro D Nadra; Laura L Perissinotti; Damián A Scherlis; Darío A Estrin Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2006-10-11 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: Silvano Geremia; Gianpiero Garau; Lisa Vaccari; Riccardo Sgarra; Maria Silvia Viezzoli; Mario Calligaris; Lucio Randaccio Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Anna I Zatsman; Huamin Zhang; William A Gunderson; William A Cramer; Michael P Hendrich Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-11-08 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Y Dou; S J Admiraal; M Ikeda-Saito; S Krzywda; A J Wilkinson; T Li; J S Olson; R C Prince; I J Pickering; G N George Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1995-07-07 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Linghao Zhong; Xin Wen; Terry M Rabinowitz; Brandy S Russell; Elizabeth F Karan; Kara L Bren Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-05-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bin Deng; Sudharsan Parthasarathy; WenFang Wang; Brian R Gibney; Kevin P Battaile; Scott Lovell; David R Benson; Hao Zhu Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-07-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jesse G Kleingardner; Benjamin D Levin; Giorgio Zoppellaro; K Kristoffer Andersson; Sean J Elliott; Kara L Bren Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: David Z Mokry; Angela Nadia-Albete; Michael K Johnson; Gudrun S Lukat-Rodgers; Kenton R Rodgers; William N Lanzilotta Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2014-06-23