Literature DB >> 19536691

Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: a latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage.

Nash Unsworth1, Thomas S Redick, Richard P Heitz, James M Broadway, Randall W Engle.   

Abstract

Complex span tasks, assumed by many to measure an individual's working memory capacity, are predictive of several aspects of higher-order cognition. However, the underlying cause of the relationships between "processing-and-storage" tasks and cognitive abilities is still hotly debated nearly 30 years after the tasks were first introduced. The current study utilised latent constructs across verbal, numerical, and spatial content domains to examine a number of questions regarding the predictive power of complex span tasks. In particular, the relations among processing time, processing accuracy, and storage accuracy from the complex span tasks were examined, in combination with their respective relationships with fluid intelligence. The results point to a complicated pattern of unique and shared variance among the constructs. Implications for various theories of working memory are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19536691     DOI: 10.1080/09658210902998047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  77 in total

1.  The Evidence Base for Improving School Outcomes by Addressing the Whole Child and by Addressing Skills and Attitudes, Not Just Content.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Early Educ Dev       Date:  2010-09-01

2.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Longitudinal evidence for functional specialization of the neural circuit supporting working memory in the human brain.

Authors:  Amy S Finn; Margaret A Sheridan; Carla L Hudson Kam; Stephen Hinshaw; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Underlying sources of cognitive-anatomical variation in multi-modal neuroimaging and cognitive testing.

Authors:  P D Watson; E J Paul; G E Cooke; N Ward; J M Monti; K M Horecka; C M Allen; C H Hillman; N J Cohen; A F Kramer; A K Barbey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Effects of Hearing Status and Sign Language Use on Working Memory.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Thomastine Sarchet; Alexandra Trani
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2016-01-10

6.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Evaluating Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Encoding, Storage, and Retrieval Strategies in Verbal Working Memory.

Authors:  Angela M AuBuchon; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency.

Authors:  Ashley L Miller; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

9.  Individual differences in baseline oculometrics: Examining variation in baseline pupil diameter, spontaneous eye blink rate, and fixation stability.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison; Ashley L Miller
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Melissa K Johnson; Robert P McMahon; Benjamin M Robinson; Alexander N Harvey; Britta Hahn; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.