UNLABELLED: During and after prolonged bed rest, changes in bone metabolic markers occur within 3 days. Resistive vibration exercise during bed rest impedes bone loss and restricts increases in bone resorption markers whilst increasing bone formation. INTRODUCTION: To investigate the effectiveness of a resistive vibration exercise (RVE) countermeasure during prolonged bed rest using serum markers of bone metabolism and whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as endpoints. METHODS:Twenty healthy male subjects underwent 8 weeks of bed rest with 12 months follow-up. Ten subjects performed RVE. Blood drawings and DXA measures were conducted regularly during and after bed rest. RESULTS:Bone resorption increased in the CTRL group with a less severe increase in the RVE group (p = 0.0004). Bone formation markers increased in the RVE group but decreased marginally in the CTRL group (p < 0.0001). At the end of bed rest, the CTRL group showed significant loss in leg bone mass (-1.8(0.9)%, p = 0.042) whereas the RVE group did not (-0.7(0.8)%, p = 0.405) although the difference between the groups was not significant (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the countermeasure restricts increases in bone resorption, increased bone formation, and reduced bone loss during bed rest.
RCT Entities:
UNLABELLED: During and after prolonged bed rest, changes in bone metabolic markers occur within 3 days. Resistive vibration exercise during bed rest impedes bone loss and restricts increases in bone resorption markers whilst increasing bone formation. INTRODUCTION: To investigate the effectiveness of a resistive vibration exercise (RVE) countermeasure during prolonged bed rest using serum markers of bone metabolism and whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as endpoints. METHODS: Twenty healthy male subjects underwent 8 weeks of bed rest with 12 months follow-up. Ten subjects performed RVE. Blood drawings and DXA measures were conducted regularly during and after bed rest. RESULTS: Bone resorption increased in the CTRL group with a less severe increase in the RVE group (p = 0.0004). Bone formation markers increased in the RVE group but decreased marginally in the CTRL group (p < 0.0001). At the end of bed rest, the CTRL group showed significant loss in leg bone mass (-1.8(0.9)%, p = 0.042) whereas the RVE group did not (-0.7(0.8)%, p = 0.405) although the difference between the groups was not significant (p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the countermeasure restricts increases in bone resorption, increased bone formation, and reduced bone loss during bed rest.
Authors: Daniel L Belavý; Carolyn A Richardson; Stephen J Wilson; Jörn Rittweger; Dieter Felsenberg Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-01-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: H E van der Wiel; P Lips; J Nauta; G Kwakkel; G Hazenberg; J C Netelenbos; W J van der Vijgh Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1993-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: D L Belavý; G Beller; G Armbrecht; F H Perschel; R Fitzner; O Bock; H Börst; C Degner; U Gast; D Felsenberg Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: S M Smith; C Castaneda-Sceppa; K O O'Brien; S A Abrams; P Gillman; N E Brooks; G J Cloutier; M Heer; S R Zwart; M E Wastney Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jennifer L L Morgan; Sara R Zwart; Martina Heer; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Karen Ericson; Scott M Smith Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-09-20
Authors: H Wang; Y Wan; K-F Tam; S Ling; Y Bai; Y Deng; Y Liu; H Zhang; W-H Cheung; L Qin; J C-Y Cheng; K-S Leung; Y Li Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Vanessa D Sherk; Carmen Chrisman; Jessica Smith; Kaelin C Young; Harshvardhan Singh; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 2.617