Literature DB >> 25749548

Estimating development cost of an interactive website based cancer screening promotion program.

David R Lairson1, Tong Han Chung2, Lisa G Smith3, Jeffrey K Springston4, Victoria L Champion5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate the initial development costs for an innovative talk show format tailored intervention delivered via the interactive web, for increasing cancer screening in women 50-75 who were non-adherent to screening guidelines for colorectal cancer and/or breast cancer.
METHODS: The cost of the intervention development was estimated from a societal perspective. Micro costing methods plus vendor contract costs were used to estimate cost. Staff logs were used to track personnel time. Non-personnel costs include all additional resources used to produce the intervention.
RESULTS: Development cost of the interactive web based intervention was $.39 million, of which 77% was direct cost. About 98% of the cost was incurred in personnel time cost, contract cost and overhead cost.
CONCLUSIONS: The new web-based disease prevention medium required substantial investment in health promotion and media specialist time. The development cost was primarily driven by the high level of human capital required. The cost of intervention development is important information for assessing and planning future public and private investments in web-based health promotion interventions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Colorectal cancer; Development costs; Early detection of cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25749548      PMCID: PMC4395551          DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  34 in total

1.  How effective is tailored print communication?

Authors:  C S Skinner; M K Campbell; B K Rimer; S Curry; J O Prochaska
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1999

2.  Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Michelle Hager; Celina Su; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2002-12

3.  Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.

Authors:  Milton C Weinstein; Bernie O'Brien; John Hornberger; Joseph Jackson; Magnus Johannesson; Chris McCabe; Bryan R Luce
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings.

Authors:  Thomas N Chirikos; Lisa K Christman; Seft Hunter; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  The effect of a stage-matched and tailored intervention on repeat mammography(1).

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski; Beverly Ehrich; Barbara K Rimer; Wayne F Velicer; Catherine E Dube; Deborah N Pearlman; Kristen K Peterson; Michael Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.

Authors:  A L Frazier; G A Colditz; C S Fuchs; K M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Nicole Urban; Scott Ramsey; Peter A Briss
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  3 in total

1.  A micro costing analysis of the development of a primary care intervention to improve the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening.

Authors:  Susan Ahern; Fiona Riordan; Aileen Murphy; John Browne; Patricia M Kearney; Susan M Smith; Sheena M McHugh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Tong Han Chung; Danmeng Huang; Timothy E Stump; Patrick O Monahan; Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-01-22

3.  Economic Evaluation of Web- versus Telephone-based Interventions to Simultaneously Increase Colorectal and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women.

Authors:  Danmeng Huang; David R Lairson; Tong H Chung; Patrick O Monahan; Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2021-07-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.