Kirsten Bouchelouche1, Jacek Capala, Peter Oehr. 1. Cancer and Molecular Imaging Unit, Research Division of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen, Koege Hospital, Koege, Denmark. bouchelouche@mail.tele.dk
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traditional morphologically based imaging modalities are now being complemented by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in prostate cancer. Metastatic prostate cancer is an attractive target for radioimmunotherapy (RIT) as no effective therapies are available. This review highlights the most important achievements within the last year in PET/CT and RIT of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Conflicting results exist on the use of choline for detection of malignant disease in the prostate gland. The role of PET/CT in N-staging remains to be elucidated further. However, F-choline and C-choline PET/CT have been demonstrated to be useful for detection of recurrence. F-choline and F-fluoride PET/CT are useful for detection of bone metastases. Prostate tumor antigens may be used as targets for RIT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen is currently under focus of a number of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J591, a monoclonal antibody, which targets the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen, shows promising results. HER2 receptors may also have a potential as target for PET/CT imaging and RIT of advanced prostate cancer. SUMMARY: PET/CT in prostate cancer has proven to play a significant role, in particular for detection of prostate cancer recurrence and bone metastases. RIT of metastatic prostate cancer warrants further investigations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traditional morphologically based imaging modalities are now being complemented by positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in prostate cancer. Metastatic prostate cancer is an attractive target for radioimmunotherapy (RIT) as no effective therapies are available. This review highlights the most important achievements within the last year in PET/CT and RIT of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Conflicting results exist on the use of choline for detection of malignant disease in the prostate gland. The role of PET/CT in N-staging remains to be elucidated further. However, F-choline and C-choline PET/CT have been demonstrated to be useful for detection of recurrence. F-choline and F-fluoride PET/CT are useful for detection of bone metastases. Prostate tumor antigens may be used as targets for RIT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen is currently under focus of a number of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J591, a monoclonal antibody, which targets the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen, shows promising results. HER2 receptors may also have a potential as target for PET/CT imaging and RIT of advanced prostate cancer. SUMMARY: PET/CT in prostate cancer has proven to play a significant role, in particular for detection of prostate cancer recurrence and bone metastases. RIT of metastatic prostate cancer warrants further investigations.
Authors: Peter M Smith-Jones; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Vincent Navarro; Diego Bastidas; Stanley J Goldsmith; Neil H Bander Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M R McDevitt; E Barendswaard; D Ma; L Lai; M J Curcio; G Sgouros; A M Ballangrud; W H Yang; R D Finn; V Pellegrini; M W Geerlings; M Lee; M W Brechbiel; N H Bander; C Cordon-Cardo; D A Scheinberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J Kotzerke; B G Volkmer; G Glatting; J van den Hoff; J E Gschwend; P Messer; S N Reske; B Neumaier Journal: Nuklearmedizin Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 1.379
Authors: Shankar Vallabhajosula; Peter M Smith-Jones; Vincent Navarro; Stanley J Goldsmith; Neil H Bander Journal: Prostate Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: D M Goldenberg; F H DeLand; S J Bennett; F J Primus; M O Nelson; R C Flanigan; J W McRoberts; A W Bruce; D E Mahan Journal: JAMA Date: 1983-08-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Neil H Bander; Edouard J Trabulsi; Lale Kostakoglu; Daniel Yao; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Peter Smith-Jones; Maureen A Joyce; Matthew Milowsky; David M Nanus; Stanley J Goldsmith Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kirsten Bouchelouche; Scott T Tagawa; Stanley J Goldsmith; Baris Turkbey; Jacek Capala; Peter Choyke Journal: Semin Nucl Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.446