Literature DB >> 12601451

Intraindividual comparison of [11C]acetate and [11C]choline PET for detection of metastases of prostate cancer.

J Kotzerke1, B G Volkmer, G Glatting, J van den Hoff, J E Gschwend, P Messer, S N Reske, B Neumaier.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a pilot trial we investigated whether significant differences in prostate cancer (PCA) imaging would be observed using [(11)C]acetate and [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography (PET).
METHODS: Twelve patients were studied with both radiotracers. Whole body PET without attenuation correction was performed after injection of 0.95 +/- 0.15 GBq [(11)C]acetate and 0.84 +/- 0.13 GBq [(11)C]choline, respectively, from 5 to 60 min p. i. Focally increased uptake in bone, below the urinary bladder or in a lymph node region was considered as tumour. Primary tumour, lymph node involvement, bone metastases, local recurrence; and no evidence of disease were known in 2, 4, 2, 2; and 2 patients, respectively.
RESULTS: [(11)C]Acetate uptake was highest in spleen and pancreas while [(11)C]choline uptake was predominant in liver and kidney parenchyma. However, interindividual variation was high. The potential of both radiotracers to detect known bone lesions, lymph node metastases, and imaging of the primary tumour was identical. However, both failed to detect a small local recurrence in two patients as well as to demonstrate lymph node involvement in one patient, which was confirmed by surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, uptake of both radiotracers in prostate cancer or its metastases was nearly identical and none of them should be favoured. At present, both radiotracers influence patient management by detection of local recurrence, lymph node, or bone metastases of PCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nuklearmedizin        ISSN: 0029-5566            Impact factor:   1.379


  53 in total

1.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? For.

Authors:  Ferruccio Fazio; Maria Picchio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? Against.

Authors:  Klaus Zöphel; Jörg Kotzerke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Malignant lipogenesis defined by 11C-acetate PET/CT predicts prostate cancer-specific survival in patients with biochemical relapse after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Naresh Regula; Michael Häggman; Silvia Johansson; Jens Sörensen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  [Principles of PET/CT and clinical application].

Authors:  A Bockisch; T Beyer; G Antoch; P Veit; S Müller; R Pink; S Rosenbaum; H Kühl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  C11-acetate and F-18 FDG PET for men with prostate cancer bone metastases: relative findings and response to therapy.

Authors:  Evan Y Yu; Mark Muzi; Joy A Hackenbracht; Brian B Rezvani; Jeanne M Link; Robert Bruce Montgomery; Celestia S Higano; Janet F Eary; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  11C/ 18F-choline PET or 11C/18F-acetate PET in prostate cancer: may a choice be recommended?

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Paolo Castellucci; Mohsen Farsad; Domenico Rubello; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  [Impact of nuclear medicine imaging techniques for lymph node surgery].

Authors:  L S Freudenberg; G Holl; S P Müller; S J Rosenbaum-Krumme; J Sciuk; A Bockisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Novel tracers and their development for the imaging of metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  [11C]choline PET/CT imaging in occult local relapse of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sven N Reske; Norbert M Blumstein; Gerhard Glatting
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.