Literature DB >> 19535698

A comparison of the effects on respiratory carbon dioxide response, arterial blood pressure, and heart rate of dexmedetomidine, propofol, and midazolam in sevoflurane-anesthetized rabbits.

Cheng Chang1, Akinori Uchiyama, Ling Ma, Takashi Mashimo, Yuji Fujino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, propofol, and midazolam are commonly used sedative-hypnotic drugs. Using a steady-state method, we examined the CO2 ventilatory response, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) effects of these three drugs in sevoflurane-anesthetized rabbits.
METHODS: New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.9 +/- 0.2 kg (mean +/- SD) were used. After anesthetic induction and tracheostomy, the animals inhaled 2% sevoflurane to ensure a stable level of sedation throughout the experiment. After preparation, the rabbits were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10 x 4) and received the following drugs: Group C, control; Group D, dexmedetomidine infused at 2 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1); Group P, propofol with the plasma concentration maintained at 15 microg/mL; Group M, midazolam initial IV 0.3 mg/kg bolus dose, followed by infusion at 1.86 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). At 15 minutes after the start of infusion, for 20 min periods, in random sequences, gas including 0%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, or 5% of CO2 was delivered to each animal. Fraction of inspired oxygen was maintained at 0.9. We did intergroup comparisons of minute ventilation (MV), respiratory rate, MAP, and HR during the final minute of each inspiratory carbon dioxide concentration (FiCO2) period.
RESULTS: For Groups P and M, the rightward shift of plots for MV against FiCO2 indicated significant respiratory depression compared with Group C. There was also significantly more depression than in Group D. We found no significant differences between Groups P and M or between Groups C and D in the plots of MV against FiCO2. No significant differences among the four groups were apparent for respiratory rate. PaCO2-MV response plots were derived from linear regression analysis of data for mean MV and mean PaCO2 at each FiCO2 to compute apneic CO2 thresholds and CO2 sensitivities. The apneic CO2 thresholds of Groups P and M were larger than those of Groups C and D. The CO2 sensitivities of Group D were slightly lower than in Group C. No similar significant difference between the CO2 sensitivities of other group pairs was apparent. MAP in Group D was lower than in Groups C and M. In Group D, HR was lower than in Groups C, P, and M.
CONCLUSIONS: The major finding is that, during sevoflurane anesthesia in rabbits, dexmedetomidine slightly altered the ventilatory response to CO2. It decreased MAP more than propofol and midazolam, which both significantly depressed the ventilatory response to CO2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535698     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a2ad5f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  [Outpatient anesthesia for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: results of a national survey].

Authors:  P Saur; J Roggenbach; S Meinl; A Klinger; N Stasche; E Martin; A Walther
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Hemodynamic characteristics of midazolam, propofol, and dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Michael A Frölich; Alireza Arabshahi; Charles Katholi; Jeevan Prasain; Stephen Barnes
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.452

3.  Respiratory rates and arterial blood-gas tensions in healthy rabbits given buprenorphine, butorphanol, midazolam, or their combinations.

Authors:  Carrie A Schroeder; Lesley J Smith
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Dexmedetomidine or midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized double blind prospective study.

Authors:  Senem Koruk; Irfan Koruk; Ayse Mizrak Arslan; Murat Bilgi; Rauf Gul; Semsettin Bozgeyik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Optimal doses of sevoflurane and propofol in rabbits.

Authors:  Yoshihide Terada; Tadahiko Ishiyama; Nobumasa Asano; Masakazu Kotoda; Kodai Ikemoto; Noriyuki Shintani; Daniel I Sessler; Takashi Matsukawa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-11-19

6.  Successful use of femoral nerve block with dexmedetomidine for fracture fixation of an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck in a patient with severe aortic stenosis: a case report.

Authors:  Yui Yamane; Takeshi Omae; Keito Kou; Sonoko Sakuraba
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2017-10-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.