PURPOSE: The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit (Part D) program debuted in January 2006. We ascertained the sociodemographic and health characteristics of Blacks and Whites who enrolled in the early stages of the program. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected between April 2006 and October 2007 from an ongoing population-based biracial study of older adults. RESULTS: We interviewed 2,694 subjects, 1,784 Blacks and 910 Whites, of whom 40% and 35% reported to have enrolled in Medicare Part D, respectively. Among Blacks, those who enrolled were more likely to be female, unmarried, have less education and income, more medical conditions, greater physical disability, and poorer physical function than Blacks who did not enroll. Among Whites, enrollees were older, female, and had less education compared with White nonenrollees. In the multivariate analyses, older age, female, being married, lower income, worse physical function, and better cognitive function were associated with program enrollment. IMPLICATIONS: These results indicate that the profiles of adults who initially enrolled in Medicare Part D differed somewhat by race. Program enrollment among Blacks was largely driven by financial need and poor health; however, among Whites, there was no such discernible pattern of enrollment. In addition, we observed a knowledge gap among Black nonenrollees who reported that they were unaware of and confused by the program and plans. The findings suggest that Medicare Part D may serve different needs in different subpopulations. The long-term impact of these differential program profiles on Black-White health disparities remains uncertain and requires continued monitoring.
PURPOSE: The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit (Part D) program debuted in January 2006. We ascertained the sociodemographic and health characteristics of Blacks and Whites who enrolled in the early stages of the program. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected between April 2006 and October 2007 from an ongoing population-based biracial study of older adults. RESULTS: We interviewed 2,694 subjects, 1,784 Blacks and 910 Whites, of whom 40% and 35% reported to have enrolled in Medicare Part D, respectively. Among Blacks, those who enrolled were more likely to be female, unmarried, have less education and income, more medical conditions, greater physical disability, and poorer physical function than Blacks who did not enroll. Among Whites, enrollees were older, female, and had less education compared with White nonenrollees. In the multivariate analyses, older age, female, being married, lower income, worse physical function, and better cognitive function were associated with program enrollment. IMPLICATIONS: These results indicate that the profiles of adults who initially enrolled in Medicare Part D differed somewhat by race. Program enrollment among Blacks was largely driven by financial need and poor health; however, among Whites, there was no such discernible pattern of enrollment. In addition, we observed a knowledge gap among Black nonenrollees who reported that they were unaware of and confused by the program and plans. The findings suggest that Medicare Part D may serve different needs in different subpopulations. The long-term impact of these differential program profiles on Black-White health disparities remains uncertain and requires continued monitoring.
Authors: Denis A Evans; David A Bennett; Robert S Wilson; Julia L Bienias; Martha Clare Morris; Paul A Scherr; Liesi E Hebert; Neelum Aggarwal; Laurel A Beckett; Rajiv Joglekar; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Julie Schneider Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-02
Authors: R S Levine; J E Foster; R E Fullilove; M T Fullilove; N C Briggs; P C Hull; B A Husaini; C H Hennekens Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2001 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Julia L Bienias; Laurel A Beckett; David A Bennett; Robert S Wilson; Denis A Evans Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Deborah A Levine; Lewis B Morgenstern; Kenneth M Langa; John D Piette; Mary A M Rogers; Sudeep J Karve Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: S Duke Han; Patricia A Boyle; Bryan D James; Lei Yu; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: JoEllen Jarrett Jamison; Junling Wang; Satya Surbhi; Samantha Adams; David Solomon; Kenneth C Hohmeier; Sharon McDonough; James C Eoff Journal: Divers Equal Health Care Date: 2016-08-23
Authors: Jennifer M Polinski; Aman Bhandari; Uzaib Y Saya; Sebastian Schneeweiss; William H Shrank Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joseph T Hanlon; Robert M Boudreau; Subashan Perera; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ronald I Shorr; Douglas C Bauer; Julie M Donohue Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: John D Piette; Ann Marie Rosland; Maria J Silveira; Rodney Hayward; Colleen A McHorney Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Patricia A Boyle; Lei Yu; Robert S Wilson; Keith Gamble; Aron S Buchman; David A Bennett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 3.240