JoEllen Jarrett Jamison1, Junling Wang2, Satya Surbhi3, Samantha Adams4, David Solomon5, Kenneth C Hohmeier6, Sharon McDonough7, James C Eoff8. 1. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Student, 881 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163. 2. Professor, Health Outcomes and Policy Research, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 881 Madison Avenue, Room 221, Memphis, TN 38163. 3. Graduate Research Assistant/Ph.D. Student, Health Outcomes and Policy Research, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Graduate Health Sciences, 956 Court Avenue, Room D224, Memphis, TN 38163. 4. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Student, 881 Madison Avenue, Room 221, Memphis, TN 38163. 5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 881 Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163. 6. Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, Director of Community Affairs, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, 193 Polk Avenue, Room 2D, Nashville, TN 37210. 7. Coordinator of Assessment and Assistant Professor, University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 881 Madison Avenue, Room 252, Memphis, TN 38163. 8. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, 881 Madison Avenue, Room 242, Memphis, TN 38163.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prior to the implementation of Medicare Part D in the United States, inequalities were found to exist in the use of medications between minority and white beneficiaries. Despite improvements in medication affordability after Medicare Part D implementation, it is still not clear whether the characteristics of the program have improved drug utilization patterns among minorities to the same degree as whites. This review aims to determine whether there were barriers for Medicare Part D to realize its potential to improve prescription drug utilization patterns among minorities. METHODS: Google Scholar, PubMed, Sciencedirect and Scopus were used to conduct a comprehensive search of the literature published since 2003 when the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) was passed, which authorized the establishment of the Part D program. All studies and documents related to the effects of Medicare Part D on minorities were included to present a relatively comprehensive review on the topic. RESULTS: Evidence indicated that minorities are not equally benefiting from Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage compared to whites. Examples of characteristics of Medicare Part D that caused significant racial differences in drug utilization include the donut hole, the complexity and number of drug plans, and drug utilization management strategies. CONCLUSION: Medicare Part D has increased access to prescription medications for the elderly. However, continued analysis and research of drug utilization patterns among minorities should be conducted to ensure that all enrollees regardless of race are benefiting equally from Medicare Part D. Identification of these barriers can provide insights on how to improve the program to allow minorities to benefit equally from the Medicare Part D program and remove health inequalities.
OBJECTIVES: Prior to the implementation of Medicare Part D in the United States, inequalities were found to exist in the use of medications between minority and white beneficiaries. Despite improvements in medication affordability after Medicare Part D implementation, it is still not clear whether the characteristics of the program have improved drug utilization patterns among minorities to the same degree as whites. This review aims to determine whether there were barriers for Medicare Part D to realize its potential to improve prescription drug utilization patterns among minorities. METHODS: Google Scholar, PubMed, Sciencedirect and Scopus were used to conduct a comprehensive search of the literature published since 2003 when the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) was passed, which authorized the establishment of the Part D program. All studies and documents related to the effects of Medicare Part D on minorities were included to present a relatively comprehensive review on the topic. RESULTS: Evidence indicated that minorities are not equally benefiting from Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage compared to whites. Examples of characteristics of Medicare Part D that caused significant racial differences in drug utilization include the donut hole, the complexity and number of drug plans, and drug utilization management strategies. CONCLUSION: Medicare Part D has increased access to prescription medications for the elderly. However, continued analysis and research of drug utilization patterns among minorities should be conducted to ensure that all enrollees regardless of race are benefiting equally from Medicare Part D. Identification of these barriers can provide insights on how to improve the program to allow minorities to benefit equally from the Medicare Part D program and remove health inequalities.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic conditions; Health illiteracy; Medication; Minorities; Prescription drug
Authors: Ilene H Zuckerman; Priscilla T Ryder; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Thomas Shaffer; Masayo Sato; Lirong Zhao; Bruce Stuart Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Amelia M Haviland; Marc N Elliott; Robert Weech-Maldonado; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Nate Orr; Ron D Hays Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Neil Steers; O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Vicki Fung; John Hsu; Elaine Quiter; Chien-Wen Tseng; Carol M Mangione Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Wesley Yin; Anirban Basu; James X Zhang; Atonu Rabbani; David O Meltzer; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Robert Nee; John S Thurlow; Keith C Norris; Christina Yuan; Maura A Watson; Lawrence Y Agodoa; Kevin C Abbott Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Yanru Qiao; Christina A Spivey; Junling Wang; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Jim Y Wan; Julie Kuhle; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; William C Cushman; Marie A Chisholm-Burns Journal: Inquiry Date: 2018 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 1.730