Literature DB >> 19531789

Does comparative effectiveness have a comparative edge?

G Caleb Alexander1, Randall S Stafford.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19531789      PMCID： PMC4406401          DOI： 10.1001/jama.2009.851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Gaps, tensions, and conflicts in the FDA approval process: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

2.  Barriers to constraining health care cost growth.

Authors:  Michael E Chernew; Peter D Jacobson; Timothy P Hofer; Keith D Aaronson; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Cost-effectiveness of first- v. second-generation antipsychotic drugs: results from a randomised controlled trial in schizophrenia responding poorly to previous therapy.

Authors:  L M Davies; S Lewis; P B Jones; T R E Barnes; F Gaughran; K Hayhurst; A Markwick; H Lloyd
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness.

Authors:  Hilke Plassmann; John O'Doherty; Baba Shiv; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Information on cost-effectiveness: an essential product of a national comparative effectiveness program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Who are the new users of antipsychotic medications?

Authors:  Marisa Elena Domino; Marvin S Swartz
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  The tomato effect. Rejection of highly efficacious therapies.

Authors:  J S Goodwin; J M Goodwin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-05-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A user's manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' report.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  Problems for clinical judgement: 5. Principles of influence in medical practice.

Authors:  Donald A Redelmeier; Robert B Cialdini
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 8.262
  9 in total
  13 in total

Review 1.  Bias in observational studies of prevalent users: lessons for comparative effectiveness research from a meta-analysis of statins.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Perspectives on comparative effectiveness research: views from diverse constituencies.

Authors:  Dave Nellesen; Howard G Birnbaum; Paul E Greenberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Ambulatory diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant pain in the United States, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Matthew Daubresse; Hsien-Yen Chang; Yuping Yu; Shilpa Viswanathan; Nilay D Shah; Randall S Stafford; Stefan P Kruszewski; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Enhancing prescription drug innovation and adoption.

Authors:  G Caleb Alexander; Alec B O'Connor; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Is treatment heterogeneity an Achilles' heel for comparative effectiveness research?

Authors:  G Caleb Alexander; Bruce L Lambert
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.705

6.  Academic centers play a vital role in the study of drug safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  Jingwen Tan; G Caleb Alexander; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  National trends in oral anticoagulant use in the United States, 2007 to 2011.

Authors:  Kate Kirley; Dima M Qato; Rachel Kornfield; Randall S Stafford; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-09-04

8.  Unsupported off-label chemotherapy in metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Jonas A de Souza; Blase Polite; Monica Perkins; Neal J Meropol; Mark J Ratain; Lee N Newcomer; G Caleb Alexander
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Changes in total body bone mineral density following a common bone health plan with two versions of a unique bone health supplement: a comparative effectiveness research study.

Authors:  Joel E Michalek; Harry G Preuss; Harry A Croft; Patti L Keith; Samuel C Keith; Monika Dapilmoto; Nicholas V Perricone; Robert B Leckie; Gilbert R Kaats
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  A comparative effectiveness study of bone density changes in women over 40 following three bone health plans containing variations of the same novel plant-sourced calcium.

Authors:  Gilbert R Kaats; Harry G Preuss; Harry A Croft; Samuel C Keith; Patti L Keith
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.