Simon Hatcher1, Cynthia Sharon, Nicola Collins. 1. Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. s.hatcher@auckland.ac.nz
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the number and characteristics of people presenting with intentional self-harm to four district health boards in New Zealand and to compare this with official data. METHODS: People presenting with self-harm were identified by searching a mixture of electronic and written databases in each DHB. RESULTS: Over 12 months 1633 people presented a total of 2087 times to these four DHBs. The highest rates were in Northland, young women and Maori. Official figures significantly underestimate the number of people who present to hospital with intentional self-harm. CONCLUSION: Considerably more people present to hospital with intentional self-harm in New Zealand than are recorded by official figures. This is important because reducing self-harm is a key part of the New Zealand health strategy. To achieve this, accurate measurement of self-harm rates is required. Encouraging improved reporting by DHBs is unlikely to work. It is suggested that dedicated monitoring sites be set up in representative DHBs to solve the problem of flawed official data collection.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to describe the number and characteristics of people presenting with intentional self-harm to four district health boards in New Zealand and to compare this with official data. METHODS:People presenting with self-harm were identified by searching a mixture of electronic and written databases in each DHB. RESULTS: Over 12 months 1633 people presented a total of 2087 times to these four DHBs. The highest rates were in Northland, young women and Maori. Official figures significantly underestimate the number of people who present to hospital with intentional self-harm. CONCLUSION: Considerably more people present to hospital with intentional self-harm in New Zealand than are recorded by official figures. This is important because reducing self-harm is a key part of the New Zealand health strategy. To achieve this, accurate measurement of self-harm rates is required. Encouraging improved reporting by DHBs is unlikely to work. It is suggested that dedicated monitoring sites be set up in representative DHBs to solve the problem of flawed official data collection.
Authors: Sarah Fortune; Sarah Hetrick; Vartika Sharma; Gabrielle McDonald; Kate M Scott; Roger T Mulder; Linda Hobbs Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Anne W Taylor; Graham Martin; Eleonora Dal Grande; Sarah Swannell; Simon Fullerton; Philip Hazell; James E Harrison Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Ivan J Perry; Paul Corcoran; Anthony P Fitzgerald; Helen S Keeley; Udo Reulbach; Ella Arensman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rory C O'Connor; Karen Wetherall; Seonaid Cleare; Sarah Eschle; Julie Drummond; Eamonn Ferguson; Daryl B O'Connor; Ronan E O'Carroll Journal: BJPsych Open Date: 2018-05-09
Authors: Sunny Collings; Gabrielle Jenkin; James Stanley; Sarah McKenzie; Simon Hatcher Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Leah Quinlivan; Louise Gorman; Donna L Littlewood; Elizabeth Monaghan; Stephen J Barlow; Stephen Campbell; Roger T Webb; Nav Kapur Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 5.744