Literature DB >> 19527747

Gene expression patterns associated with chicken jejunal development.

Dirkjan Schokker1, Arjan J W Hoekman, Mari A Smits, Johanna M J Rebel.   

Abstract

Jejunal development occurs in a spatio-temporal pattern and is characterized by morphological and functional changes. To investigate jejunal development at the transcriptomic level, we performed microarray studies in 1-21-day-old chickens. Nine gene clusters were identified, each with a specific gene expression pattern. Subsequently, groups of genes with similar functions could be identified. Genes involved in morphological and functional development were highly expressed immediately after hatch with declining expression patterns afterwards. Immunological development can be roughly divided based on expression patterns into three processes over time; first innate response and immigration of immune cells, secondly differentiation and specialization, and thirdly maturation and immune regulation. We conclude that specific gene expression patterns coincide with the immunological, morphological, and functional development as measured by other methods. Our data show that transcriptomic approaches provide more detailed information on the biological processes underlying jejunal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19527747     DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol        ISSN: 0145-305X            Impact factor:   3.636


  8 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of chicken--salmonella infection experiments.

Authors:  Marinus F W Te Pas; Ina Hulsegge; Dirkjan Schokker; Mari A Smits; Mark Fife; Rima Zoorob; Marie-Laure Endale; Johanna M J Rebel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Jejunal gene expression patterns correlate with severity of systemic infection in chicken.

Authors:  Dirkjan Schokker; Mari A Smits; Johanna Mj Rebel
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-06-03

3.  Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines.

Authors:  Dirkjan Schokker; Gosse Veninga; Stephanie A Vastenhouw; Alex Bossers; Freddy M de Bree; Lucia M T E Kaal-Lansbergen; Johanna M J Rebel; Mari A Smits
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Perturbation of microbiota in one-day old broiler chickens with antibiotic for 24 hours negatively affects intestinal immune development.

Authors:  Dirkjan Schokker; Alfons J M Jansman; Gosse Veninga; Naomi de Bruin; Stephanie A Vastenhouw; Freddy M de Bree; Alex Bossers; Johanna M J Rebel; Mari A Smits
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Modulation of microbial communities and mucosal gene expression in chicken intestines after galactooligosaccharides delivery In Ovo.

Authors:  Anna Slawinska; Aleksandra Dunislawska; Arkadiusz Plowiec; Malgorzata Radomska; Jagoda Lachmanska; Maria Siwek; Siria Tavaniello; Giuseppe Maiorano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evolution of cis- and trans-regulatory divergence in the chicken genome between two contrasting breeds analyzed using three tissue types at one-day-old.

Authors:  Qiong Wang; Yaxiong Jia; Yuan Wang; Zhihua Jiang; Xiang Zhou; Zebin Zhang; Changsheng Nie; Junying Li; Ning Yang; Lujiang Qu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Intestinal Immune Development Is Accompanied by Temporal Deviation in Microbiota Composition of Newly Hatched Pigeon Squabs.

Authors:  Qianqian Xu; Wenyan Zhao; Yan Li; Xiaoting Zou; Xinyang Dong
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-05-17

8.  Identification of Type II Interferon Receptors in Geese: Gene Structure, Phylogenetic Analysis, and Expression Patterns.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Shun Chen; Yulin Qi; Qin Zhou; Mingshu Wang; Renyong Jia; Dekang Zhu; Mafeng Liu; Fei Liu; Xiaoyue Chen; Anchun Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.