PURPOSE: Capecitabine is effective against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that sequential treatment with dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel/capecitabine would be active and tolerable in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: In this prospective phase II clinical trial patients with HER2-negative and node-positive or locally advanced tumors were eligible to receive four cycles of EC (100/600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks with G-CSF on days 3-10, followed by four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine (75/1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1-14) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled with median age of 49, and 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. The median tumor size was 2.5 cm, with a median of two axillary nodes involved. Seventy-five percent of the first 20 patients had grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Dose reduction of capecitabine to 800 mg/m2 reduced the grade 2/3 HFS incidence to 31% in the remaining patients. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. All 20 patients treated preoperatively responded, with 5 (25%) pathologic complete responses and 3 additional pT0N1 tumors. At a median follow-up of 48 (range 28-60) months, the event-free and overall survival rates are 91 and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with dose-dense EC followed by docetaxel/capecitabine, using a lower capecitabine dose than that approved for MBC, has an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging activity when used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
PURPOSE:Capecitabine is effective against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that sequential treatment with dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel/capecitabine would be active and tolerable in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: In this prospective phase II clinical trial patients with HER2-negative and node-positive or locally advanced tumors were eligible to receive four cycles of EC (100/600 mg/m2) every 2 weeks with G-CSF on days 3-10, followed by four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine (75/1,000 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1-14) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled with median age of 49, and 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. The median tumor size was 2.5 cm, with a median of two axillary nodes involved. Seventy-five percent of the first 20 patients had grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Dose reduction of capecitabine to 800 mg/m2 reduced the grade 2/3 HFS incidence to 31% in the remaining patients. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. All 20 patients treated preoperatively responded, with 5 (25%) pathologic complete responses and 3 additional pT0N1 tumors. At a median follow-up of 48 (range 28-60) months, the event-free and overall survival rates are 91 and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential treatment with dose-dense EC followed by docetaxel/capecitabine, using a lower capecitabine dose than that approved for MBC, has an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging activity when used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
Authors: G Gasparini; M Toi; R Miceli; P B Vermeulen; R Dittadi; E Biganzoli; A Morabito; M Fanelli; C Gatti; H Suzuki; T Tominaga; L Y Dirix; M Gion Journal: Cancer J Sci Am Date: 1999 Mar-Apr
Authors: Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Keun Seok Lee; Jungsil Ro; Byung-Ho Nam; Eun Sook Lee; Youngmee Kwon; Hye Soo Kwon; Ki Wook Chung; Han Sung Kang; Eun A Kim; Seok Won Kim; Kyung Hwan Shin; Seok-Ki Kim Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-07-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: I Craig Henderson; Donald A Berry; George D Demetri; Constance T Cirrincione; Lori J Goldstein; Silvana Martino; James N Ingle; M Robert Cooper; Daniel F Hayes; Katherine H Tkaczuk; Gini Fleming; James F Holland; David B Duggan; John T Carpenter; Emil Frei; Richard L Schilsky; William C Wood; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rachel M Layman; Dafydd G Thomas; Kent A Griffith; Jeffrey B Smerage; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Kathleen M Diehl; Lisa A Newman; Michael S Sabel; James A Hayman; Lori J Pierce; Daniel F Hayes; Anne F Schott Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-07-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Prudence Francis; John Crown; Angelo Di Leo; Marc Buyse; Ana Balil; Michael Andersson; Bo Nordenskjöld; Istvan Lang; Raimund Jakesz; Daniel Vorobiof; Jorge Gutiérrez; Guy van Hazel; Stella Dolci; Sophie Jamin; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Martine Piccart-Gebhart Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-01-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L C Pronk; P Vasey; A Sparreboom; B Reigner; A S Planting; R J Gordon; B Osterwalder; J Verweij; C Twelves Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 7.640