Literature DB >> 17653851

A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer.

Keun Seok Lee1, Jungsil Ro, Byung-Ho Nam, Eun Sook Lee, Youngmee Kwon, Hye Soo Kwon, Ki Wook Chung, Han Sung Kang, Eun A Kim, Seok Won Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Seok-Ki Kim.   

Abstract

We aimed to determine the efficacies of a non-anthracycline-containing regimen, docetaxel/capecitabine (TX), in comparison with an anthracycline-containing regimen, doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), as primary chemotherapy for node-positive early stage breast cancer. In this phase-III single center randomized study, we randomized 209 women with axillary node positive, stage II/III breast cancer to receive four cycles of either TX or AC followed by surgery and cross-over to the other treatment as an adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was tumor pathologic complete response (pCR). Clinical response rates, toxicity profiles, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival were secondary objectives. In total, 204 patients had clinical and radiological evaluation of response, and underwent surgery. Compared with AC, TX increased pCR in primary tumors (21% vs. 10%, respectively, P = 0.024) and clinical response (84% vs. 65%, P = 0.003). TX was associated with less nausea and vomiting, but more stomatitis, diarrhea, myalgia, and skin/nail changes than AC. With a median follow-up of 37 months, there was no significant difference in DFS by treatment groups (P = 0.932). Fewer patients developed recurrence who achieved pCR in lymph node (LN) (P = 0.025; hazard ratio, 0.189; 95% CI, 0.044-0.815) in the multivariate analysis. TX showed superior efficacies to AC with increased pathologic and clinical complete response rates. Although these findings did not translate into a gain in DFS, the patients who achieved pCR in LN developed significantly less recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17653851     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-007-9672-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  23 in total

1.  Predictive factors of pathologic complete response and clinical tumor progression after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III breast cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Heon Jeong; So-Youn Jung; In Hae Park; Keun Seok Lee; Han-Sung Kang; Seok Won Kim; Youngmee Kwon; Eun A Kim; Kyung Lan Ko; Byung-Ho Nam; Seeyoun Lee; Jungsil Ro
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Chemotherapy-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Donna R Rivera; Patricia A Ganz; Meghan S Weyrich; Hanna Bandos; Joy Melnikow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Chemotherapy with PLGA microspheres containing docetaxel decreases angiogenesis in human hepatoma xenograft.

Authors:  Zhi-kui Chen; Min-xian Cai; Jing Yang; Li-wu Lin; En-sheng Xue; Jing Huang; Hong-fen Wei; Xiu-juan Zhang; Li-ming Ke
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Primary systemic therapy with intermittent weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with stage II and III breast cancer: a phase II trial.

Authors:  Keun Seok Lee; Jungsil Ro; Eun Sook Lee; Han Sung Kang; Seok Won Kim; Byung-Ho Nam; Youngmee Kwon; Eun-A Kim; Kyung Hwan Shin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Taxane acute pain syndrome (TAPS) in patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer-a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricardo Fernandes; Sasha Mazzarello; Brian Hutton; Risa Shorr; Habeeb Majeed; Mohammed Fk Ibrahim; Carmel Jacobs; Michael Ong; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  A Proposal to Redefine Pathologic Complete Remission as Endpoint following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Mircea Dediu; Christoph Zielinski
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Sequential administration of dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and locally advanced or node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Yago Nieto; José Manuel Aramendía; Jaime Espinós; Susana De la Cruz; Oscar Fernández-Hidalgo; Marta Santisteban; Leyre Arbea; Javier Aristu; Rafael Martínez-Monge; Marta Moreno; Luis Pina; Josu Sola; Gerardo Zornoza; Fernando Martínez Regueira
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Final results of a phase I/II pilot study of capecitabine with or without vinorelbine after sequential dose-dense epirubicin and paclitaxel in high-risk early breast cancer.

Authors:  Volkmar Müller; Christoph Thomssen; Marcus Schmidt; Manfred Glados; Christian Jackisch; Volker Heilmann; Axel Hinke; Antje Lehnert; Henryk Borowicz; Volker Möbus
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Clinical efficacy of including capecitabine in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qiuyun Li; Yi Jiang; Wei Wei; Huawei Yang; Jianlun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.