Literature DB >> 19525883

Influence of tear film and contact lens osmolality on ocular comfort in contact lens wear.

Ulrike Stahl1, Mark D P Willcox, Thomas Naduvilath, Fiona Stapleton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel method to measure the osmolality of worn contact lenses and assess the impact of contact lens and tear film osmolality on comfort during short-term wear.
METHODS: A new method to measure contact lens osmolality was validated by testing for repeatability and by evaluating independence of lens material, power, and osmolality value of the lens. This method was then used in a clinical study. Nine different lens types were each worn by 15 subjects. Osmolality, tear film, and ocular surface parameters were tested for their association to comfort using linear mixed model.
RESULTS: The method to measure contact lens osmolality was independent of lens material (p = 0.911), power (p = 0.826), and osmolality value of the lens (p = 0.858). No differences in contact lens osmolalities between two different days were observed (p > 0.05). Comfort after 6 h of lens wear was associated with the osmolality of the worn lens (p = 0.006, r = -0.41) but not with tear osmolality after lens wear (p = 0.993). Comfort was associated with conjunctival indentation (p = 0.002, r = -0.37). Osmolality of worn lenses significantly correlated with tear film break-up time (p = 0.003, r = -0.22), lens water content (p < 0.001, r = -0.58), conjunctival indentation (p < 0.001, r = 0.45), and ocular sensitivity (p < 0.05) after 6 h lens wear.
CONCLUSION: This newly developed method to measure contact lens osmolality was repeatable and independent of lens material, power, and osmolality value of the contact lens. Although no association between tear film osmolality and ocular comfort after 6 h of lens wear could be demonstrated, contact lens osmolality was associated with comfort and ocular surface characteristics, and may provide the link between symptoms and clinical observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525883     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ae027b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology.

Authors:  Fiona Stapleton; Carl Marfurt; Blanka Golebiowski; Mark Rosenblatt; David Bereiter; Carolyn Begley; Darlene Dartt; Juana Gallar; Carlos Belmonte; Pedram Hamrah; Mark Willcox
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Comparison of tear osmolarity and ocular comfort between daily disposable contact lenses: hilafilcon B hydrogel versus narafilcon A silicone hydrogel.

Authors:  Ozge Sarac; Canan Gurdal; Basak Bostancı-Ceran; Izzet Can
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Associations Between Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses, Lens Fit, and Comfort After One Day of Contact Lens Adaptation by Neophytes.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Min Fang; Ross Franklin; Ava-Gaye Simms; Zohra Fadli; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.152

4.  Tear osmolarity and dry eye symptoms in women using oral contraception and contact lenses.

Authors:  Sarah P Chen; Giacomina Massaro-Giordano; Maxwell Pistilli; Courtney A Schreiber; Vatinee Y Bunya
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Oxygen permeability of soft contact lenses in different pH, osmolality and buffering solution.

Authors:  Se Eun Lee; So Ra Kim; Mijung Park
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Cytokine changes in tears and relationship to contact lens discomfort.

Authors:  Mark D P Willcox; Zhenjun Zhao; Thomas Naduvilath; Percy Lazon de la Jara
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 2.367

7.  Tear Film Characteristics During Wear of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Giancarlo Montani; Maurizio Martino
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-04

8.  Lotrafilcon B with HydraGlyde moisture matrix or Samfilcon A: Contralateral comparison study for comfort.

Authors:  Nilay Yuksel; Derya Yaman
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.