Literature DB >> 19525534

Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.

Shena Lu1, Shihui Han.   

Abstract

The aim of this research was to investigate the potential impacts of task demand and stimulus salience on the stimulus-driven attentional capture effect. The participants performed an inefficient visual search task while an irrelevant luminance singleton was present. In Experiment 1, the task demand was manipulated while the stimulus salience of the irrelevant singleton was fixed. With the same salient singleton, the attentional capture effect was observed in the low-difficulty condition but disappeared in the high-difficulty condition. In Experiment 2, the stimulus salience was manipulated while the task demand was fixed. With the same task, the highly salient singleton captured attention, whereas the relatively lowly salient singleton could not. In Experiment 3, both task demand and stimulus salience were manipulated simultaneously. The stimulus-driven attentional capture effect by the irrelevant singleton increased not only as the task demand decreased but also as the stimulus salience increased. The present study might provide a way to reconcile conflicting findings in the attentional capture literature; the underlying neural mechanism is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525534     DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.

Authors:  Risa Sawaki; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  A critical role of temporoparietal junction in the integration of top-down and bottom-up attentional control.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Chi-Fu Chang; Sisi Xi; I-Wen Huang; Zuxiang Liu; Chi-Hung Juan; Yanhong Wu; Jin Fan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The role of uncertainty and reward on eye movements in a virtual driving task.

Authors:  Brian T Sullivan; Leif Johnson; Constantin A Rothkopf; Dana Ballard; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  How top-down and bottom-up attention modulate risky choice.

Authors:  Yonatan Vanunu; Jared M Hotaling; Mike E Le Pelley; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Effects of Goal Relevance and Perceptual Features on Emotional Items and Associative Memory.

Authors:  Wei B Mao; Shu An; Xiao F Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.