Literature DB >> 19525318

Comparison between odor thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol and butanol.

Ilona Croy1, Kornelia Lange, Franziska Krone, Simona Negoias, Han-Seok Seo, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Aim of the study was to compare results of odor threshold test using different numbers of dilution steps, separately for butanol and phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA).
METHODS: A total of 116 subjects participated (29 patients with olfactory dysfunction and 87 normosmic subjects). The olfactory threshold for butanol and PEA was examined with 8 (wide step method) and 16 (narrow step method) dilutions. With a delay of about 1 week, all 4 tests were repeated.
RESULTS: Test time was shortened by approximately 2 min (25%) for patients when using the wide step method. Butanol and PEA thresholds were not significantly different; in addition, a significant correlation was found between thresholds for the 2 odors (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). Threshold test with both odorants as well as with wide or narrow step method provided satisfying reproducibility (test-retest reliability: r = 0.80-0.84, P < 0.001). Patients with olfactory dysfunction could be clearly separated from normosmic subjects using all 4 different tests. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that threshold testing with PEA is an alternative to butanol. The wide step method provided similar results as the narrow step method but required less time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525318     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  19 in total

1.  Perception of specific trigeminal chemosensory agonists.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; J Albrecht; B Bryant; J N Lundström
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Edmund A Pribitkin; Pamela Dalton; David Rosen; Brian Lyman; Karen K Yee; Nancy E Rawson; Beverly J Cowart
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  Insights into smell and taste sensitivity in normal weight and overweight-obese adolescents.

Authors:  Rachel S Herz; Eliza Van Reen; Caroline A Gredvig-Ardito; Mary A Carskadon
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-04-04

4.  Olfaction in the psychosis prodrome: electrophysiological and behavioral measures of odor detection.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shelly Ben-David; Shiva Fekri; Gerard E Bruder; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Effects of 20 mg oral Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol on the olfactory function of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Bruno G Oertel; Dagmar Ludyga; Alfred Ultsch; Thomas Hummel; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Olfactory FMRI in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Thomas Hummel; Klaus Fliessbach; Michael Abele; Thorsten Okulla; Jens Reden; Heinz Reichmann; Ullrich Wüllner; Antje Haehner
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-28

7.  Sensory Processing in the Autism Spectrum: The Role of Attention to Detail and Somatic Trait Anxiety in the Olfactory Perception of the General Population.

Authors:  Filipa Barros; Cláudia Figueiredo; Adriana Costa; Sandra C Soares
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-07

8.  SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Authors:  Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Agreeable smellers and sensitive neurotics--correlations among personality traits and sensory thresholds.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Maria Springborn; Jörn Lötsch; Amy N B Johnston; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Air pollution from industrial swine operations and blood pressure of neighboring residents.

Authors:  Steve Wing; Rachel Avery Horton; Kathryn M Rose
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.