Literature DB >> 19524753

After the honeymoon comes divorce: long-term use of the antegrade continence enema procedure.

Iain E Yardley1, Satu-Liisa Pauniaho, Colin T Baillie, Rick R Turnock, Pat Coldicutt, Graham L Lamont, Simon E Kenny.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Having reported that 18% of children discontinue use of the antegrade continence enema (ACE) after 5 years, we aimed to determine long-term use after an ACE procedure.
METHODS: A postal/telephone questionnaire was conducted. Subjects were consecutive children undergoing an ACE between 1993 and 1999. Outcome measures were use of ACE, reasons for nonuse, complications, and overall satisfaction.
RESULTS: Of 84 eligible subjects, data were available on 61 (73%) aged 22.4 years (15.5-35.1 years). Underlying diagnoses included spina bifida (n = 27), anorectal malformations (n = 18), constipation (n = 11), Hirschsprung's disease (n = 1), sacral agenesis (n = 2), and trauma/tumor (n = 2). Follow-up was 11.02 years (8.34-14.39 years). Thirty-six (59%) of 61 patients were still using their ACE. Reasons for nonuse were lack of effectiveness (n = 14), complications (n = 5), psychologic issues (n = 2), and poor compliance (n = 2). There was no association between diagnosis and nonuse (chi(2), P = .63). In those still using ACE, the overall satisfaction score was 4.1 (1-5). Several individuals reported feeling abandoned on becoming adults and losing the support they had in childhood.
CONCLUSION: There is a late "failure" rate for the ACE procedure. However, satisfaction was high among those still using the ACE. This study further emphasizes the need for robust transitional care arrangements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524753     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  9 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of paediatric anorectal anomalies and the role and efficacy of parent support groups for such conditions.

Authors:  Eunice Gribbin; David Croaker
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  Malone Antegrade Continence Enemas vs. Cecostomy vs. Transanal Irrigation-What Is New and How Do We Counsel Our Patients?

Authors:  Maryellen S Kelly
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Long-term follow-up of patients after antegrade continence enema procedure.

Authors:  Anees A Siddiqui; Steven J Fishman; Stuart B Bauer; Samuel Nurko
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Inpatient and emergency room visits for adolescents and young adults with spina bifida living in South Carolina.

Authors:  Joshua R Mann; Julie A Royer; Margaret A Turk; Suzanne McDermott; Margaret M Holland; Orgul D Ozturk; James W Hardin; Judy K Thibadeau
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  How long will I have my ACE? The natural history of the antegrade continence enema stoma in idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  A Kate Khoo; Evita Askouni; Sonia Basson; Jessica Ng; Stewart Cleeve
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Antegrade continence enema (ACE): predictors of outcome in 111 patients.

Authors:  S Basson; A Zani; S McDowell; E Athanasakos; S Cleeve; S Phelps; P Charlesworth
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Long-term outcomes of a Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) for the treatment of fecal incontinence or constipation in adults.

Authors:  R Sturkenboom; A A van der Wilt; S M J van Kuijk; A Ahmad; P T Janssen; L P S Stassen; J Melenhorst; S O Breukink
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Appendicostomy in preschool children with anorectal malformation: successful early bowel management with a high frequency of minor complications.

Authors:  Pernilla Stenström; Christina Granéli; Martin Salö; Kristine Hagelsteen; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Refractory functional constipation: clinical management or appendicostomy?

Authors:  Vanesca P A de Arruda; Maria A Bellomo-Brandão; Joaquim M Bustorff-Silva; Elizete Aparecida Lomazi
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.990

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.