Literature DB >> 8156272

Infections in cancer patients: some controversial issues.

S C Schimpff1, D A Scott, J C Wade.   

Abstract

Despite more than two decades of clinical research into the management of infections in the neutropenic cancer patient, many patients still develop serious morbidity from infection and all too many still die. A number of controversies surround (a) the use of combination versus monotherapy for initial empiric administration; (b) the use of vancomycin as part of the initial regimen; (c) the origin of Staphylococcus epidermidis infections (i.e., mostly from vascular catheters or mostly from the alimentary canal); (d) the use of acyclovir for herpes simplex prophylaxis during remission induction for acute leukemia patients not undergoing bone marrow transplantation; (e) the use of alimentary canal microbial suppression or reverse isolation in a room with laminar air flow, or both, as infection prevention techniques. Current recommendations and observations include the following. (a) Monotherapy with ceftazidime or imipenem is effective and appropriate for patients with moderate granulocytopenia at limited risk for infection with a resistant organism. Combination therapy is recommended for patients with profound, persistent granulocytopenia who are at high risk for gram-negative bacteremia; such bacteremic patients have a better prognosis with combined-modality therapy. (b) Vancomycin need not be included in the initial regimen although some centers may choose to do so because of the high prevalence of gram-positive bacteremias. (c) Despite the ubiquitous presence of indwelling vascular catheters, most S. epidermidis infections among neutropenic patients originate from along the alimentary canal. (d) Herpes simplex infection is much more common following standard remission induction chemotherapy than previously recognized. Acyclovir will reduce these infections and concurrently probably reduce the likelihood of resultant bacterial/fungal co-infections and superinfections. (e) Selective microbial suppression is appropriate for patients expected to experience prolonged (more than 2 weeks) or profound (below 100 granulocytes/microliters) granulocytopenia. Agents chosen should suppress aerobic but not anaerobic flora (maintain colonization resistance) and need to have an effect on both the oral cavity and esophagus as well as the intestines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156272     DOI: 10.1007/bf00572090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  57 in total

1.  Anti-endotoxin monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  H S Warren; R L Danner; R S Munford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Serum bactericidal test in volunteers--a review.

Authors:  S C Schimpff; G L Drusano; H C Standiford
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Three antibiotic regimens in the treatment of infection in febrile granulocytopenic patients with cancer. The EORTC international antimicrobial therapy project group.

Authors:  S C Schimpff; H Gaya; J Klastersky; M H Tattersall; S H Zinner
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Origin of infection in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Significance of hospital acquisition of potential pathogens.

Authors:  S C Schimpff; V M Young; W H Greene; G D Vermeulen; M R Moody; P H Wiernik
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Oral acyclovir for prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation.

Authors:  J C Wade; B Newton; N Flournoy; J D Meyers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Imipenem compared with ceftazidime plus vancomycin as initial therapy for fever in neutropenic children with cancer.

Authors:  P Riikonen
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Combination of amikacin and carbenicillin with or without cefazolin as empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Project Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A comparison of imipenem to ceftazidime with or without amikacin as empiric therapy in febrile neutropenic patients.

Authors:  K V Rolston; P Berkey; G P Bodey; E J Anaissie; N M Khardori; J H Joshi; M J Keating; F A Holmes; F F Cabanillas; L Elting
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-02

Review 9.  Herpes simplex virus infection in the immunocompromised cancer patient.

Authors:  C I Bustamante; J C Wade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Ceftazidime monotherapy for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J W Sanders; N R Powe; R D Moore
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  5 in total

1.  Colony-stimulating factors for adjunctive therapy of infections in neutropenic cancer patients.

Authors:  J I Mayordomo; F Rivera; H Cortes-Funes
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Controversies in supportive care: destructive or beneficial diversity?

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Infectious complications of combination anticancer chemotherapy for urogenital cancers.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; K Takahashi; M Tanaka; J Kumazawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Disseminated soft tissue infection and sepsis with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a bone marrow transplant patient.

Authors:  J H Lipton; K S Macdonald
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1996-11

Review 5.  [Febrile neutropenia: practical aspects].

Authors:  P Harten; B Seyfarth; N Schmitz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-10-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.