Literature DB >> 19524390

Timely follow-up of positive fecal occult blood tests strategies associated with improvement.

Adam A Powell1, Amy A Gravely, Diana L Ordin, James E Schlosser, Melissa R Partin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In light of previous research indicating that many patients fail to receive timely diagnostic follow-up of positive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) initiated a national CRC diagnosis quality-improvement (QI) effort.
PURPOSE: This article documents the percent of patients receiving follow-up within 60 days of a positive CRC screening fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and identifies improvement strategies that predict timely follow-up.
METHODS: In 2007, VA facilities completed a survey in which they indicated the degree to which they had implemented a series of improvement strategies and described barriers to improvement. Three types of strategies were assessed: developing QI infrastructure, improving care delivery processes, and building gastroenterology capacity. Survey data were merged with a measure of 60-day positive-FOBT follow-up. Facility-level predictors of timely follow-up were identified and relationships among categories of improvement strategies were assessed. Data were analyzed in 2008.
RESULTS: The median facility-reported 60-day follow-up rate for positive screening FOBTs was 24.5%. Several strategies were associated with timeliness of follow-up. The relationship between the implementation of QI infrastructure strategies and timely follow-up was mediated by the implementation of process-change strategies. Although constraints on gastroenterology capacity were often sited as a key barrier, implementation of strategies to address this issue was unassociated with timely follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Developing QI infrastructure appears to be an effective strategy for improving FOBT follow-up when this work is followed by process improvements. Increasing gastroenterology capacity may be more difficult than improving processes of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524390     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  21 in total

1.  Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice.

Authors:  Ann Oluloro; Amanda F Petrik; Ann Turner; Tanya Kapka; Jennifer Rivelli; Patricia A Carney; Somnath Saha; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-08

2.  Complicating "the good result": narratives of colorectal cancer screening when cancer is not found.

Authors:  Jean M Hunleth; Robert Gallo; Emily K Steinmetz; Aimee S James
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04

3.  The Need for an Integrated Patient Navigation Pathway to Improve Access to Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Sreedevi Thamarasseril; Taft Bhuket; Chuck Chan; Benny Liu; Robert J Wong
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-06

4.  Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Neeraj K Arora; Gigi Yuan; Judith Lee Smith; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Bringing an organizational perspective to the optimal number of colorectal cancer screening options debate.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Adam A Powell; Diana J Burgess; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Lack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?

Authors:  Charlotte M Carlson; Katharine A Kirby; Michele A Casadei; Melissa R Partin; Christine E Kistler; Louise C Walter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-10-11

7.  Improving hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applying lessons from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Jasmin A Tiro; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  An examination of racial differences in process and outcome of colorectal cancer care quality among users of the veterans affairs health care system.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; George L Jackson; Morris Weinberger; Dawn Provenzale; Bryce B Reeve; William R Carpenter
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  Developing and sustaining quality improvement partnerships in the VA: the Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative.

Authors:  George L Jackson; Adam A Powell; Diana L Ordin; James E Schlosser; Jeffery Murawsky; Janis Hersh; George Ponte; Leah L Zullig; Fabiane Erb; Renee Parlier; David A Haggstrom; Nancy Koets; Peter D Mills; Joseph Francis; Michael J Kelley; Michael L Davies; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Michael P Garcia; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Yingye Zheng; Douglas A Corley; Ethan A Halm; Amit G Singal; Carrie N Klabunde; Chyke A Doubeni; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Joanne E Schottinger; Beverly B Green; Virginia P Quinn; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.