Leah L Zullig1, George L Jackson, Morris Weinberger, Dawn Provenzale, Bryce B Reeve, William R Carpenter. 1. Center of Excellence for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: zullig@email.unc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Veterans Affairs (VA) manages the largest US integrated health care system. Although quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care is well chronicled, there is a paucity of research examining racial differences in this care. This study examines racial differences in 2 dimensions of quality of VA CRC care: processes (time to treatment) and outcomes (survival). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data were from the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP), a nationwide VA quality-monitoring program. Study patients were white and African American men diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC between 2003 and 2006 who received definitive CRC surgery. We examined 3 quality indicators: time from (1) surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (stages II-III disease), (2) surgery to surveillance colonoscopy (stages I-III disease), and (3) surgery to death (stages I-III disease). Unadjusted analyses used log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. Adjusted analyses used Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, there was no evidence of racial differences across the 3 quality measures. In adjusted Cox regression, there were no racial differences in time to initiation of chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; P = .61) or surgery to death (HR, 0.94; P = .49). In adjusted Cox regression, among those receiving colonoscopy within 7 to 18 months after surgery, white patients experienced slightly shorter median times to surveillance colonoscopy than did African American patients (367 vs. 383 days; HR, 0.63; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Other than a small racial difference in timing of surveillance colonoscopy, there was little evidence of racial differences in quality of CRC care among VA health care system users. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Veterans Affairs (VA) manages the largest US integrated health care system. Although quality of VA colorectal cancer (CRC) care is well chronicled, there is a paucity of research examining racial differences in this care. This study examines racial differences in 2 dimensions of quality of VA CRC care: processes (time to treatment) and outcomes (survival). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data were from the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP), a nationwide VA quality-monitoring program. Study patients were white and African American men diagnosed with nonmetastatic CRC between 2003 and 2006 who received definitive CRC surgery. We examined 3 quality indicators: time from (1) surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (stages II-III disease), (2) surgery to surveillance colonoscopy (stages I-III disease), and (3) surgery to death (stages I-III disease). Unadjusted analyses used log-rank and Wilcoxon tests. Adjusted analyses used Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, there was no evidence of racial differences across the 3 quality measures. In adjusted Cox regression, there were no racial differences in time to initiation of chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; P = .61) or surgery to death (HR, 0.94; P = .49). In adjusted Cox regression, among those receiving colonoscopy within 7 to 18 months after surgery, white patients experienced slightly shorter median times to surveillance colonoscopy than did African American patients (367 vs. 383 days; HR, 0.63; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Other than a small racial difference in timing of surveillance colonoscopy, there was little evidence of racial differences in quality of CRC care among VA health care system users. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Colorectal neoplasms; Health care disparities; Health care quality; Minority health; US Veterans Affairs
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Ruth A Perrin; Steven Rappaport; Joanne M Stevens; John G Demakis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Alvaro Figueredo; R Bryan Rumble; Jean Maroun; Craig C Earle; Bernard Cummings; Robin McLeod; Lisa Zuraw; Caroline Zwaal Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2003-10-06 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: George L Jackson; Leah L Zullig; Sean M Phelan; Dawn Provenzale; Joan M Griffin; Steven B Clauser; David A Haggstrom; Rahul M Jindal; Michelle van Ryn Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Leah L Zullig; Karen M Goldstein; Kellie J Sims; Christina D Williams; Michael Chang; Dawn Provenzale; Michael J Kelley Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jonathan Pastrana Del Valle; Nathanael R Fillmore; George Molina; Mark Fairweather; Jiping Wang; Thomas E Clancy; Stanley W Ashley; Richard D Urman; Edward E Whang; Jason S Gold Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Leah L Zullig; Karen M Goldstein; Hayden B Bosworth; Sara M Andrews; Susanne Danus; George L Jackson; Dawn Provenzale; Morris Weinberger; Michael J Kelley; Corrine I Voils Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: John Q Lin; Shirley Q Li; Todd A Pezzi; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton D Fuller; Aileen B Chen; Bruce D Minsky; David L Schwartz; Brenda Y Hernandez; Stephen G Chun Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2020-02-12