Literature DB >> 19524380

Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies.

Burkhard Madea1, Johanna Preuss.   

Abstract

A multicentre retrospective analysis of 4450 autopsies carried out due to suspicion of medical malpractice in 17 German institutes of forensic medicine from 1990 to 2000 was performed for the German Federal Ministry of Health. During the time period analysed an increase of cases could be mentioned. The main results of the study are: in the cooperating institutes the total number of autopsies due to suspected medical malpractice ranged from 1.4 to 20%. In more than 40% of the cases preliminary proceedings were started because the manner of death was certified as non-natural or not clarified. Hospital doctors were more affected by medical malpractice claims than doctors in private practice. However, the number of confirmed cases of medical malpractice was higher for doctors in private practice than for hospital doctors. Although surgery is still at the top of the disciplines involved in medical malpractice claims the number of confirmed surgical cases was below the average. Mistakes in care were confirmed to be above the average. Medico-legal autopsies are still a very sufficient method to evaluate cases of medical malpractice: 2863 cases could already be clarified by autopsy. Up to now there is no systematic registration of medical malpractice charges in Germany. A systematic registration should be initiated to build up and/or improve error reporting systems and, thus, to improve patient safety. Compared to other sources of medical malpractice claims (arbitration committees of the medical chambers, reference material of health and insurance companies, files of civil courts) the data of the present multicentre study are in so far unique as only lethal cases were evaluated and a complete autopsy report was available as basis of an expert opinion in alleged medical malpractice cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524380     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  9 in total

Review 1.  Increasing the reach of forensic genetics with massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Bruce Budowle; Sarah E Schmedes; Frank R Wendt
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Court decisions on medical malpractice.

Authors:  Jan-Paul Knaak; Markus Parzeller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Brain Trauma Mortality Rate Score Scale (BTMRSS): Postmortem Evaluation of the Events.

Authors:  Alexandrina Nikova; Ivaylo Dimitrov
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-06-19

Review 4.  A systemic review of toxic death in clinical oncology trials: an Achilles' heel in safety reporting revisited.

Authors:  B Penninckx; W M Van de Voorde; A Casado; N Reed; C Moulin; M Karrasch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Presumed adverse events in health care are a frequent indication for medico-legal autopsy in Finland.

Authors:  Lasse Pakanen; Noora Keinänen; Paula Kuvaja
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Investigation of medical intervention with fatal outcome: the impact of post-mortem CT and CT angiography.

Authors:  Axel Heinemann; Hermann Vogel; Martin Heller; Antonios Tzikas; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Diagnostic errors in fatal medical malpractice cases in Shanghai, China: 1990-2015.

Authors:  Pan Gao; Xiaoqiang Li; Ziqin Zhao; Nong Zhang; Kaijun Ma; Liliang Li
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Medical Malpractice in Turkey: Pediatric Cases Resulting in Death.

Authors:  Erdem Hösükler; İbrahim Üzün; İpek Esen Melez; Bilgin Hösükler; Murat Elevli
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-11

9.  Medical Malpractice in Wuhan, China: A 10-Year Autopsy-Based Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Fanggang He; Liliang Li; Jennifer Bynum; Xiangzhi Meng; Ping Yan; Ling Li; Liang Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.