Literature DB >> 19524166

General considerations regarding assessment of professional behaviour.

Walther N K A van Mook1, Scheltus J van Luijk, Helen O'Sullivan, Valerie Wass, Lambert W Schuwirth, Cees P M van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

Core medical knowledge has been assessed for over fifty years and technical and communication skills for at least twenty. The assessment of professionalism however has failed to achieve recognition within this time frame. The interest in the assessment of professionalism and professional behaviour thus is a fairly recent development. This article will firstly clarify how professional behaviour assessment relates to other assessment methods using the framework proposed by Miller6. Thereafter a brief overview will be provided of the current "tool box" of methods available to assess professionalism. Data on the validity, reliability, feasibility, acceptability and educational utility of these "tools" as derived from published evidence will be reviewed. Subsequently a general overview of the way forward in the assessment of professionalism and professional behaviour will be given.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19524166     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Intern Med        ISSN: 0953-6205            Impact factor:   4.487


  11 in total

1.  Measuring professional behaviour in canadian physical therapy students' objective structured clinical examinations: an environmental scan.

Authors:  Robyn Davies; Cindy Ellerton; Cathy Evans
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Professionalism and Communication Education in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: The Learner Perspective.

Authors:  David A Turner; Geoffrey M Fleming; Margaret Winkler; K Jane Lee; Melinda F Hamilton; Christoph P Hornik; Toni Petrillo-Albarano; Katherine Mason; Richard Mink
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Development and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Assessment Tool for Students' Perceptions of Medical Professionalism.

Authors:  Fei-Fei Yu; Chun-Yan Du; Zi-Feng Liu; Li-Jin Chen; Yi-Xiang Huang; Ling-Ling Zhang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-25

4.  Reaching Consensus on Measuring Professional Behaviour in Physical Therapy Objective Structured Clinical Examinations.

Authors:  Robyn Davies; Cindy Ellerton; Cathy Evans
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  A multirater instrument for the assessment of simulated pediatric crises.

Authors:  Aaron W Calhoun; Megan Boone; Karen H Miller; Rebecca L Taulbee; Vicki L Montgomery; Kimberly Boland
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

6.  Responding to moderate breaches in professionalism: an intervention for medical students.

Authors:  Anne C Gill; Elizabeth A Nelson; Ayesha I Mian; Jean L Raphael; David R Rowley; Amy L Mcguire
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 7.  The Desired Concept Maps and Goal Setting for Assessing Professionalism in Medicine.

Authors:  Salman Y Guraya; Shaista S Guraya; Nehal Anam Mahabbat; Khulood Yahya Fallatah; Bashaer Ahmad Al-Ahmadi; Hadeel Hadi Alalawi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

8.  Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Susannah M Wyles; Fiona Carter; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Are pediatric critical care medicine fellowships teaching and evaluating communication and professionalism?

Authors:  David A Turner; Richard B Mink; K Jane Lee; Margaret K Winkler; Sara L Ross; Christoph P Hornik; Jennifer J Schuette; Katherine Mason; Stephanie A Storgion; Denise M Goodman
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 10.  Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: a systematic review and categorisation.

Authors:  Marianne Mak-van der Vossen; Walther van Mook; Stéphanie van der Burgt; Joyce Kors; Johannes C F Ket; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi Kusurkar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.