Literature DB >> 19523999

Feedforward impedance control efficiently reduce motor variability.

Rieko Osu1, Ken-ichi Morishige, Hiroyuki Miyamoto, Mitsuo Kawato.   

Abstract

Despite the existence of neural noise, which leads variability in motor commands, the central nervous system can effectively reduce movement variance at the end effector to meet task requirements. Although online correction based on feedback information is essential for reducing error, feedforward impedance control is another way to regulate motor variability. This Update Article reviews key studies examining the relation between task constraints and impedance control for human arm movement. When a smaller reaching target is given as a task constraint, flexor and extensor muscles are co-activated, and positional variance is decreased around the task constraint. Trial-by-trial muscle activations revealed no on-line feedback correction, indicating that humans are able to regulate their impedance in advance. These results demonstrate that not only on-line feedback correction, but also feedforward impedance control, helps reduce the motor variability caused by internal noise to realize dexterous movements of human arms. A computational model of movement planning considering the presence of signal-dependent noise provides a unifying framework that potentially accounts for optimizing impedance to maximize accuracy. A recently proposed learning algorism formulated as a V-shaped learning function explains how the central nervous system acquires impedance to optimize accuracy as well as stability and efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19523999     DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  9 in total

1.  Older adults learn less, but still reduce metabolic cost, during motor adaptation.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A computational model for optimal muscle activity considering muscle viscoelasticity in wrist movements.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kambara; Duk Shin; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  How does age affect leg muscle activity/coactivity during uphill and downhill walking?

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Normalized Index of Synergy for Evaluating the Coordination of Motor Commands.

Authors:  Shunta Togo; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

6.  Control model for dampening hand vibrations using information of internal and external coordinates.

Authors:  Shunta Togo; Takahiro Kagawa; Yoji Uno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  On the Role of Physical Interaction on Performance of Object Manipulation by Dyads.

Authors:  Keivan Mojtahedi; Qiushi Fu; Marco Santello
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Stochastic optimal open-loop control as a theory of force and impedance planning via muscle co-contraction.

Authors:  Bastien Berret; Frédéric Jean
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Practice reduces task relevant variance modulation and forms nominal trajectory.

Authors:  Rieko Osu; Ken-ichi Morishige; Jun Nakanishi; Hiroyuki Miyamoto; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.