BACKGROUND:Women with twin pregnancy are at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Progesterone seems to be effective in reducing preterm birth in selected high-risk singleton pregnancies, albeit with no significant reduction in perinatal mortality and little evidence of neonatal benefit. We investigated the use of progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 500 women with twin pregnancy were recruited from nine UK National Health Service clinics specialising in the management of twin pregnancy. Women were randomised, by permuted blocks of randomly mixed sizes, either to daily vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg (n=250) or to placebo gel (n=250) for 10 weeks from 24 weeks' gestation. All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment for the duration of the study. The primary outcome was delivery or intrauterine death before 34 weeks' gestation. Analysis was by intention to treat. Additionally we undertook a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data to establish the efficacy of progesterone in prevention of early (<34 weeks' gestation) preterm birth or intrauterine death in women with twin pregnancy. This study is registered, number ISRCTN35782581. FINDINGS: Three participants in each group were lost to follow-up, leaving 247 analysed per group. The combined proportion of intrauterine death or delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy was 24.7% (61/247) in the progesterone group and 19.4% (48/247) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI 0.89-2.09; p=0.16). The rate of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. The meta-analysis confirmed that progesterone does not prevent early preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy (pooled OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89-1.51). INTERPRETATION:Progesterone, administered vaginally, does not prevent preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy. FUNDING: Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Women with twin pregnancy are at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Progesterone seems to be effective in reducing preterm birth in selected high-risk singleton pregnancies, albeit with no significant reduction in perinatal mortality and little evidence of neonatal benefit. We investigated the use of progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 500 women with twin pregnancy were recruited from nine UK National Health Service clinics specialising in the management of twin pregnancy. Women were randomised, by permuted blocks of randomly mixed sizes, either to daily vaginal progesterone gel 90 mg (n=250) or to placebo gel (n=250) for 10 weeks from 24 weeks' gestation. All study personnel and participants were masked to treatment assignment for the duration of the study. The primary outcome was delivery or intrauterine death before 34 weeks' gestation. Analysis was by intention to treat. Additionally we undertook a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data to establish the efficacy of progesterone in prevention of early (<34 weeks' gestation) preterm birth or intrauterine death in women with twin pregnancy. This study is registered, number ISRCTN35782581. FINDINGS: Three participants in each group were lost to follow-up, leaving 247 analysed per group. The combined proportion of intrauterine death or delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy was 24.7% (61/247) in the progesterone group and 19.4% (48/247) in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI 0.89-2.09; p=0.16). The rate of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. The meta-analysis confirmed that progesterone does not prevent early preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy (pooled OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89-1.51). INTERPRETATION:Progesterone, administered vaginally, does not prevent preterm birth in women with twin pregnancy. FUNDING: Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate.
Authors: Roberto Romero; Kypros Nicolaides; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Ann Tabor; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; Eduardo Da Fonseca; George W Creasy; Katharina Klein; Line Rode; Priya Soma-Pillay; Shalini Fusey; Cetin Cam; Zarko Alfirevic; Sonia S Hassan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-12-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: William A Grobman; Elizabeth A Thom; Catherine Y Spong; Jay D Iams; George R Saade; Brian M Mercer; Alan T N Tita; Dwight J Rouse; Yoram Sorokin; Ronald J Wapner; Kenneth J Leveno; Sean Blackwell; M Sean Esplin; Jorge E Tolosa; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; J Peter Van Dorsten Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield Journal: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Agatha S Critchfield; Reid Mccabe; Nikolai Klebanov; Lauren Richey; Simona Socrate; Errol R Norwitz; David L Kaplan; Michael House Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Hannah H Chang; Jim Larson; Hannah Blencowe; Catherine Y Spong; Christopher P Howson; Sarah Cairns-Smith; Eve M Lackritz; Shoo K Lee; Elizabeth Mason; Andrew C Serazin; Salimah Walani; Joe Leigh Simpson; Joy E Lawn Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 79.321