Literature DB >> 19523619

Prospective evaluation of EUS versus CT scan for staging of ampullary cancer.

Everson L A Artifon1, Decio Couto, Paulo Sakai, Eduardo B da Silveira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignancies of the biliary and pancreatic systems are associated with a poor prognosis. However, ampullary cancer carries a better prognosis and is often diagnosed when curative treatment is still possible. Accurate staging is important for the determination of the most appropriate treatment option.
OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the test performance characteristics of EUS and CT in loco-regional staging of ampullary neoplasms, and (2) to determine the impact of CT scan results on the test performance characteristics of EUS. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective single-arm intervention study performed in 2 academic hospitals. RESULTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Thirty-seven patients were screened and 33 staged with EUS and CT. A total of 27 patients (13 men; mean age, 69.5 years; mean serum bilirubin level, 12.6 mg/dL) with locally advanced disease completed the protocol with EUS and CT and underwent surgical resection. Tumor classifications were as follows: 2 patients (7.4%), T1 tumors; 13 patients (48.1%), T2 tumors; and 12 patients (44.4%), T3 tumors, as per surgical pathology. Seventeen tumors (62.9%) were classified as N0 and 10 (37.1%) as N1. The difference in proportion of correct tumor (74.1% vs 51.8%; P = .15, 95% CI, -0.06-0.50) and lymph node (81.4% vs 55.5%; P = .07, 95% CI, -0.01-0.53) staging by EUS and CT, respectively, was not statistically significantly different. However, the strength of tumor (kappa 0.51 vs 0.11) and nodal (kappa 0.59 vs 0.05) agreement with pathology was statistically significantly higher for EUS than for CT (P < .05). EUS was more sensitive and specific than CT for tumor and nodal staging, and the association of CT to EUS data did not improve the final test accuracy. LIMITATION: Low number of T1 tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS is an accurate diagnostic test and exhibits a high level of agreement with surgical pathology. CT findings do not improve the test performance characteristics of EUS. Therefore, the evaluation for metastatic disease should not be compromised by CT protocols that aim to perform tumor and nodal staging. Further studies to determine the role of specialized CT protocols in patients with ampullary malignancies are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19523619     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  17 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jiong Chen; Renbao Yang; Yin Lu; Yunlian Xia; Hangcheng Zhou
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Tamburrino; Deniece Riviere; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

Review 4.  Management of ampullary neoplasms: A tailored approach between endoscopy and surgery.

Authors:  Francesca Panzeri; Stefano Crippa; Paola Castelli; Francesca Aleotti; Alessandro Pucci; Stefano Partelli; Giuseppe Zamboni; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  The diagnostic accuracy and strength of agreement between endoscopic ultrasound and histopathology in the staging of ampullary tumors.

Authors:  Eric Wee; Sandeep Lakhtakia; Rajesh Gupta; Sekaran Anuradha; Mahesh Shetty; Rakesh Kalapala; Amitabh Monga; Arjunan Saravanan; Pradeep Rebala; Mohan Ramchandani; Guduru Venkat Rao; Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-21

6.  Performance characteristics of EUS for locoregional evaluation of ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Suzette E Schmidt; Mohammad A Al-Haddad; Julia LeBlanc; John M DeWitt; Lee McHenry; Evan L Fogel; James L Watkins; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Review of the investigation and surgical management of resectable ampullary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  James Askew; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Is tumour size an underestimated feature in the current TNM system for malignancies of the pancreatic head?

Authors:  David Petermann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Giancarlo Caletti; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Endoscopic ultrasound assessment of lesions of the ampulla of Vater is of particular value in low-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Keith J Roberts; Neil McCulloch; Rob Sutcliffe; John Isaac; Paolo Muiesan; Simon Bramhall; Darius Mirza; Ravi Marudanayagam; Brinder S Mahon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.